Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:80490 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 48452 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2015 20:25:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Jan 2015 20:25:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=guilhermeblanco@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=guilhermeblanco@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.223.177 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.223.177 mail-ie0-f177.google.com Received: from [209.85.223.177] ([209.85.223.177:54386] helo=mail-ie0-f177.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id AF/CB-19120-2B0D6B45 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:25:23 -0500 Received: by mail-ie0-f177.google.com with SMTP id rd18so11023441iec.8 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:25:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=cFVi4iU5qtB7WH0SgkB4zG5YG3aljlMDqCSDSX2LW4U=; b=A8funywk0gbUM7Gn4W1Hc/UR0ZgWHu/bNmlz7nnB+7Rzqhk9CCtR1RmZPAldtfdVPH SR+Xtszv8VVeyvPRItmLK5JTiI1LCw1fEIYTRsv41v9bTymFZ6EyMnSc0jgR+zBOOeQc Xx0gtLr+jdnz/csYFkmsaAnIFNzLq0IupIISdDIRk0i5o192icyAxIx4v4khZgqEiO5a 5bKvRSYaSv0NOy6nHk2mfJ/HlSlmdMldMvdrFaLPMbsu5Jdl6SP1EG3WaNeh07Q2zdAo Oi5T97guRAafk2rovoi9/gn5k8XzPlebr1oYE7Mp+F+pcc7UuPYhh5tPE7aW1ny9ZmFG nhsg== X-Received: by 10.50.67.102 with SMTP id m6mr6764557igt.4.1421267120316; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:25:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.238.75 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:25:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54B6D045.1070801@gmail.com> References: <52243BA6.5040905@sugarcrm.com> <54B6C047.3070301@mabe.berlin> <54B6C88E.2050604@mabe.berlin> <54B6D045.1070801@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:25:00 -0500 Message-ID: To: Stanislav Malyshev Cc: Marc Bennewitz , Adam Harvey , PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd75844d66726050ca2892f Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Skipping parameters take 2 From: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com ("guilhermeblanco@gmail.com") --047d7bd75844d66726050ca2892f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Stas, As I said, we should look at that patch as we implemented Named Parameters there with everything you mentioned. Cheers, On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > > > -1 on this proposal > > > > +1 on named parameters > > Come on, we've already talked about it like 20 times and it has special > paragraph in the RFC dedicated exactly to this. It's not instead named > params, we can do both. > > > Pierrick and I both implemented this support for Annotations back in > 2010. > > Maybe it's worth to look into that patch for some ideas. > > Annotations are great and I'd like them to be resurrected (provided that > we don't get bogged down again with "let's implement a Turing-complete > DSL for for ORMs inside annotations because we have like 1 or even 2 use > cases for it!") but how it is relevant to the topic or to named params? > That said, if you want to branch the topic and discuss it it's fine, > just please change the subj. > -- > Stas Malyshev > smalyshev@gmail.com > -- Guilherme Blanco MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com GTalk: guilhermeblanco Toronto - ON/Canada --047d7bd75844d66726050ca2892f--