Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:80489 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 46997 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2015 20:23:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Jan 2015 20:23:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.173 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.173 mail-ob0-f173.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.173] ([209.85.214.173:48922] helo=mail-ob0-f173.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id AA/7B-19120-B40D6B45 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:23:39 -0500 Received: by mail-ob0-f173.google.com with SMTP id nt9so10056561obb.4 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:23:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QJsE/Agzvn3+0iSav0p7u90bKv9IzswTf/Z3DIDEVU8=; b=g7itL7xglTan+QAEJAgFII/Olyi9fBAPlXUeoM4CcoZ2mcc4gvWbiDkj6o0CWJ3N+N Uoi37qHwxr+K1wHG76ygwYHb9eUP7ekF/woKRCxIz8uKa/qtSzN+7nmMSnBzR+N0u1dI Y/BnK2Nd1sQwFEUGjMZRDxHHvX0aJ+U2YZMAbL8iOJ7Pvlfs5NbNCzUi7sNe5eMPFcDD nddqEj+wE7bCHC459nVNWuZa6cdAS4J0uiXaE+WlwLhenk8JaNQ94B+eQxSeIi+1ON+G TN9yqzII++x3zWcj3QhB7vdJxMuiU6jCbx45BeiWjUpqPbxjQeS0wjUz4gDG86Q/GpNJ PJQg== X-Received: by 10.60.133.108 with SMTP id pb12mr3663288oeb.39.1421267016521; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:23:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from Stas-Air.local (108-66-6-48.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [108.66.6.48]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ky2sm12252867oeb.7.2015.01.14.12.23.35 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:23:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54B6D045.1070801@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:23:33 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "guilhermeblanco@gmail.com" , Marc Bennewitz CC: Adam Harvey , PHP internals References: <52243BA6.5040905@sugarcrm.com> <54B6C047.3070301@mabe.berlin> <54B6C88E.2050604@mabe.berlin> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Skipping parameters take 2 From: smalyshev@gmail.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Hi! > -1 on this proposal > > +1 on named parameters Come on, we've already talked about it like 20 times and it has special paragraph in the RFC dedicated exactly to this. It's not instead named params, we can do both. > Pierrick and I both implemented this support for Annotations back in 2010. > Maybe it's worth to look into that patch for some ideas. Annotations are great and I'd like them to be resurrected (provided that we don't get bogged down again with "let's implement a Turing-complete DSL for for ORMs inside annotations because we have like 1 or even 2 use cases for it!") but how it is relevant to the topic or to named params? That said, if you want to branch the topic and discuss it it's fine, just please change the subj. -- Stas Malyshev smalyshev@gmail.com