Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:80487
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.180 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <54B6C88E.2050604@mabe.berlin>
References: <52243BA6.5040905@sugarcrm.com> <54B6C047.3070301@mabe.berlin>
 <CADajX4A7iquRmYP1LqV+wkg_s9k+N4TORjTY5J9LSGmG-Oh+mQ@mail.gmail.com> <54B6C88E.2050604@mabe.berlin>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:13:58 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFp73Xu=ZeXTZMoEgS-hdKGhcpuORE6WLHN25e0=hbVcW6FRpQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marc Bennewitz <dev@mabe.berlin>
Cc: Adam Harvey <aharvey@php.net>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1140f33e653515050ca262c9
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Skipping parameters take 2
From: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com ("guilhermeblanco@gmail.com")

--001a1140f33e653515050ca262c9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi,

-1 on this proposal

+1 on named parameters

As of for this...

> > handy and easier. I could dig the archives but I don't remember what
> > was the reason why we rejected the idea back then.
>
> Bikeshedding about the syntax mostly, but that all pales compared to
> amount of work that needs to be done in the engine to support named
> params. Unless, of course, I'm completely wrong and there's an easy way
> to do it, which I am totally missing - in which case please point it out.

Pierrick and I both implemented this support for Annotations back in 2010.
Maybe it's worth to look into that patch for some ideas.

Regards,

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Marc Bennewitz <dev@mabe.berlin> wrote:

>
> Am 14.01.2015 um 20:21 schrieb Adam Harvey:
>
>> On 14 January 2015 at 11:15, Marc Bennewitz <dev@mabe.berlin> wrote:
>>
>>> But I think adding "default" as new keyword is a big BC break!
>>>
>> Default already is a keyword: http://php.net/switch. There's no BC break.
>>
>
> OMG you are right - my fault
>
>
>
>>  I personally also don't like it and asked myself why can't the parameter
>>> simply skipped?
>>>
>> That was in the original proposal, but counting commas is pretty lousy
>> if you're skipping more than one or two parameters. Having a keyword
>> makes it more readable.
>>
>> Adam
>>
>>
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>


-- 
Guilherme Blanco
MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com
GTalk: guilhermeblanco
Toronto - ON/Canada

--001a1140f33e653515050ca262c9--