Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:80352
Return-Path: <francois@tekwire.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 36527 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2015 04:50:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 11 Jan 2015 04:50:26 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=francois@tekwire.net; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=francois@tekwire.net; sender-id=softfail
Received-SPF: softfail (pb1.pair.com: domain tekwire.net does not designate 212.27.42.2 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: francois@tekwire.net
X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.27.42.2 smtp2-g21.free.fr  
Received: from [212.27.42.2] ([212.27.42.2:53026] helo=smtp2-g21.free.fr)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 6C/7D-48183-01102B45 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 23:50:25 -0500
Received: from moorea (unknown [82.240.16.115])
	by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 192974B0026;
	Sun, 11 Jan 2015 05:48:16 +0100 (CET)
Reply-To: <francois@tekwire.net>
To: "'Stanislav Malyshev'" <smalyshev@gmail.com>,
	"'PHP Internals'" <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <54B1C50F.7020304@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <54B1C50F.7020304@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 05:50:15 +0100
Message-ID: <003d01d02d5a$1753f870$45fbe950$@tekwire.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQGsx8W5U28o13qNe5fAwEtRlWF1jJ0BI45g
Content-Language: fr
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 150110-2, 10/01/2015), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Default parent constructors RFC
From: francois@tekwire.net (=?UTF-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois_Laupretre?=)

> De : Stanislav Malyshev [mailto:smalyshev@gmail.com]
>
> TLDR: this RFC would make a call to parent::__construct() succeed (as =
in
> "not produce a fatal error") even if the parent class does not define =
a
> ctor. Same for __destruct and __clone. The motivation for it is in the
> RFC and here: https://php100.wordpress.com/2014/11/04/default-
> constructors/

+1.

Considering implicit empty constructors and destructors is totally =
intuitive and should have been done a long time ago.

For __clone, no opinion as I never used it.

Fran=C3=A7ois