Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:80338 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 4228 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2015 23:26:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Jan 2015 23:26:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@beccati.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@beccati.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain beccati.com designates 176.9.114.167 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@beccati.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 176.9.114.167 spritz.beccati.com Received: from [176.9.114.167] ([176.9.114.167:47116] helo=mail.beccati.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 63/C7-48183-715B1B45 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 18:26:16 -0500 Received: (qmail 5243 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2015 23:26:11 -0000 Received: from home.beccati.com (HELO ?192.168.1.202?) (88.149.176.119) by mail.beccati.com with SMTP; 10 Jan 2015 23:26:11 -0000 Message-ID: <54B1B502.9050503@beccati.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 00:25:54 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stanislav Malyshev , Internals CC: Andrea Faulds References: <14F63BD9-73FD-49A3-9EA2-48FE35DB915C@ajf.me> <54AFAAA5.4090301@beccati.com> <54B1AB9A.20605@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <54B1AB9A.20605@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RESULT] [RFC] PHP 5.7 From: php@beccati.com (Matteo Beccati) On 10/01/2015 23:45, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: >> of forthcoming RFCs. If some "evil" BC breaks get to PHP7, then having >> 5.7 might have been handy, but we've just ruled out this possibility. > > We didn't actually - we could resurrect that RFC and have another vote > when the circumstances change. It's rather embarrassing, but I just didn't think about it ;) Thanks for the clarification. Cheers -- Matteo Beccati Development & Consulting - http://www.beccati.com/