Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:80337
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.42 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <14F63BD9-73FD-49A3-9EA2-48FE35DB915C@ajf.me>
References: <14F63BD9-73FD-49A3-9EA2-48FE35DB915C@ajf.me>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 08:06:50 +0900
Message-ID: <CAGa2bXaPh3LEmpdpT7PGs-xwXRU2PPwwy-q_TS8V5h32RbxcvQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me>
Cc: Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e012955747276a3050c545614
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RESULT] [RFC] PHP 5.7
From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki)

--089e012955747276a3050c545614
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Andrea,

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 5:28 AM, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote:

> I=E2=80=99m actually closing this vote a little late, it should=E2=80=99v=
e closed a bit
> before 3pm GMT, but I assumed the vote had been opened in the evening. No
> harm done.
>
> The vote on the PHP 5.7 RFC has closed. By 19 votes to 14, the RFC has
> been rejected. This means we won=E2=80=99t be having a PHP 5.7 release, u=
nless
> another RFC is made and voted on.
>
> The RFC and vote totals are here: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php57
>

I thought there will be 5.7 and didn't pay much attention on this. Slow
transition is better than too fast. I can understand the argument that
PHP 7 does not break much, but I'm in favor of having 5.7 still.

As Stas pointed out, let's have a vote again if PHP 7 includes more
destructive
changes.

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net

--089e012955747276a3050c545614--