Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:80336
Return-Path: <smalyshev@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 98968 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2015 22:45:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 10 Jan 2015 22:45:59 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.180 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.180 mail-ob0-f180.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.214.180] ([209.85.214.180:43756] helo=mail-ob0-f180.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id DA/D6-48183-7ABA1B45 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 17:45:59 -0500
Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id wp4so17945647obc.11
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 14:45:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=2lJebBJQgqxwilfag/II1qxEbHh/K0rzv+wFJCOlwAg=;
        b=wp/YrQNsNxPIN480SX9PKBnc0VNSYmNcRk7FgW/5QsEXGiLLoWcNlHtZ5TxAC65OBS
         wpG9ylVtFor8hioR8SJtawj/26g8piCSSeQCYpFDzbxavWmXhFMEkg78S2eMXk6hm9hb
         BIAH4NJZpjNX+W8xkYFSOblkJpYfkVHuAz/3d/fXKtuEFzGxL9zm7bP0iLxNE7hUArF+
         nvApuC/9PBsWcGdwUmAoxy15VEiBdF07YCNwbFjf+d9w2ZWBQMTdkkDi0jhGS044a+Io
         J8krlPv/jDKk65wnDvq3RY3Z9wmHlW5pL2Y9p1HUvrX0fNWuLe8hHzZHD2RNdboQ0aVO
         /Cgw==
X-Received: by 10.202.197.132 with SMTP id v126mr12813844oif.2.1420929956545;
        Sat, 10 Jan 2015 14:45:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.145] (108-66-6-48.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [108.66.6.48])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u23sm6508176oie.1.2015.01.10.14.45.55
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Sat, 10 Jan 2015 14:45:56 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54B1AB9A.20605@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 14:45:46 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Matteo Beccati <php@beccati.com>, Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
CC: Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me>
References: <14F63BD9-73FD-49A3-9EA2-48FE35DB915C@ajf.me> <54AFAAA5.4090301@beccati.com>
In-Reply-To: <54AFAAA5.4090301@beccati.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RESULT] [RFC] PHP 5.7
From: smalyshev@gmail.com (Stanislav Malyshev)

Hi!

> The current PHP7 doesn't have huge BC breaks as far as I can tell, and
> that's why I (and possibly others) have voted "no".

For the record, it's exactly why I voted no too. If we end up having
ones (e.g. a huge BC break looming in the strict types RFC) that may change.

> of forthcoming RFCs. If some "evil" BC breaks get to PHP7, then having
> 5.7 might have been handy, but we've just ruled out this possibility.

We didn't actually - we could resurrect that RFC and have another vote
when the circumstances change.
-- 
Stas Malyshev
smalyshev@gmail.com