Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:80333
Return-Path: <francois@tekwire.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 92440 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2015 21:49:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 10 Jan 2015 21:49:25 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=francois@tekwire.net; sender-id=softfail
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=francois@tekwire.net; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail
Received-SPF: softfail (pb1.pair.com: domain tekwire.net does not designate 212.27.42.2 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: francois@tekwire.net
X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.27.42.2 smtp2-g21.free.fr  
Received: from [212.27.42.2] ([212.27.42.2:34532] helo=smtp2-g21.free.fr)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 2B/A5-48183-46E91B45 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 16:49:25 -0500
Received: from moorea (unknown [82.240.16.115])
	by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB564B0143;
	Sat, 10 Jan 2015 22:47:17 +0100 (CET)
Reply-To: <francois@tekwire.net>
To: "'Dan Ackroyd'" <danack@basereality.com>,
	<nf.laupretre@yahoo.fr>
Cc: <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <000b01d02cf9$fe912bb0$fbb38310$@yahoo.fr> <CA+kxMuQtjAKnu8-KA7d4-OSWm05OrQOW5wwg2fRKcOu9kO5nCg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+kxMuQtjAKnu8-KA7d4-OSWm05OrQOW5wwg2fRKcOu9kO5nCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 22:49:15 +0100
Message-ID: <001701d02d1f$47eaf140$d7c0d3c0$@tekwire.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQE+UhOLzXhaFqc9GzKOwgQCqk+iUwF8XzfnndG27gA=
Content-Language: fr
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 150110-2, 10/01/2015), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Add cyclic string replacements
From: francois@tekwire.net (=?UTF-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois_Laupretre?=)

> De : Dan Ackroyd [mailto:danack@basereality.com]
>=20
> The RFC is missing one thing if nothing else; a reason for why this
> functionality would be so much better implemented in the core than in
> userland code.

I thought it was trivial : first, performance and then, ease of use, but =
I can elaborate.