Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:80310 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 13304 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2015 23:39:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Jan 2015 23:39:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dmitry@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dmitry@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 209.85.220.178 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dmitry@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.178 mail-vc0-f178.google.com Received: from [209.85.220.178] ([209.85.220.178:35134] helo=mail-vc0-f178.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 24/10-11748-1B660B45 for ; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 18:39:30 -0500 Received: by mail-vc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id hq11so4123952vcb.9 for ; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:39:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=g5mK83nWjZaa/ANEy7azOAQoC598XzkIKQiwvl5Nq+M=; b=GwSgwLT9sBM0wMKmrgSNb+FB/N5D7h5jWKIDdptw61M8kWB1H/AVPiW+Rm0pJD6+NB Odgh2lR8lPiO0ewLg5z0FaKcRByGNr37LXYwCP0pHJg8TL0nT6GK8jAyky3JhKmItnoK PWn0x1jQ2t/K6pWwkEH21+RT359VGMSYVrwDtCAFHv3qix3C1bNXy1atWjHOH21m6y0c jjbkp1lT4wHWnNcGttYX3hjuSLfacxEMzZcBtOA5Sz4yDwpqTKkveAWJxZn7Z7Qtm4/M KRitxRClOGLGD3GJkHszfIrGC41V9e/OLqKJQjtJwUDD3WA12JVO53YwaQOrkBGLkLFX 8Zrg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkEMmF+x+MnPCzUldU+6+TUOmgelBICad+AVgIpWEuAMwu0DA+okwYjzEEjkO5F4bkQ16nBapxA22bnSkWaPA7sEitwSp3peIMmLaz2ZIhC8H4CVxDiToOaAQmdbxUWqskdCmE/xGm+J7v2Px+U6d7vYj8p5Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.146.145 with SMTP id h17mr10799122vcv.53.1420846766443; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:39:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.26.40 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 15:39:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 03:39:26 +0400 Message-ID: To: Levi Morrison Cc: internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b343474cb634f050c40aac2 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Pre-Vote] Return Types From: dmitry@zend.com (Dmitry Stogov) --047d7b343474cb634f050c40aac2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 yeah, I remember I saw something :) Lets do the core work first and then decide how the Reflection should look like. Thanks. Dmitry. On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Levi Morrison wrote: > > The implementation misses support for reflection. > > I think, it doesn't make a lot of sense to introduce Reflection support > for > > return types but not for argument types. > > Probably, it's better to provide a single and consistent RFC for both. > > There is a draft RFC for this that Sara and I have each worked on a > bit: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reflectionparameter.typehint > --047d7b343474cb634f050c40aac2--