Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:80309
Return-Path: <morrison.levi@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 99775 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2015 18:26:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 9 Jan 2015 18:26:53 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=morrison.levi@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=morrison.levi@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: morrison.levi@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.176 mail-ob0-f176.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.214.176] ([209.85.214.176:52029] helo=mail-ob0-f176.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 92/B7-39109-B6D10B45 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 13:26:52 -0500
Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id vb8so14452048obc.7
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:26:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=oicnzA64eWlsRxotWCalvwDSNNAVSo3Rj+Rby5f1StY=;
        b=yVEHMGPAdlhiFLICrqYN/M2CCY1pquoin8FCv4ybP9QYWBZlmfx3A9xm/BuDhhlyPD
         U4wKj0GyjbQnsFqHipkFDAHXKAVEXjZSceaZYOZaavEQl/hodesKnMhDYB6TlFsvKsXb
         5EQmgz34r8VxepBsqduyrLSkTaoUiOVRcZ3v31hgQVOmLHCnyl/f3iaAuL51dDcRTvmF
         hvsUr3q14F6+ZYlbBR+b24VKGXw05wax5Kd9f3Obcjr9BBM9nLQlJFy684QjeIaORJFD
         nEGCb5HRH2xDdf8f6Wfw3jkja9qAhZxJBdilaueg3JEIVu9Mn6zJujKThs2ZVd8BqOIc
         Su7g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.63.193 with SMTP id i1mr10238294oes.47.1420828008410;
 Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:26:48 -0800 (PST)
Sender: morrison.levi@gmail.com
Received: by 10.76.150.168 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 10:26:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CA+9eiLtdM9Gc9PpX7oCOi1GZL9eLX+q0cpwDfRur8poJi06bHw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFMT4NqyoYYQ30rdz5PEckRWSA6eBDUMv11fVSa3dCvDJZpnLQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFMT4NpgTocRHCMQ4eUkBSZVjU6PCj7jnKLHTK0qtwUDy=PsZg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+9eiLtdM9Gc9PpX7oCOi1GZL9eLX+q0cpwDfRur8poJi06bHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 11:26:48 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Bqf55mPis4LLgAQ2JrdSzsrv7nQ
Message-ID: <CAFMT4NrVyoTgE3C4fpBKjygSCLCoG+fCNvgfFf3fYvKjv10bcQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com>
Cc: internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Pre-Vote] Return Types
From: levim@php.net (Levi Morrison)

> The implementation misses support for reflection.
> I think, it doesn't make a lot of sense to introduce Reflection support for
> return types but not for argument types.
> Probably, it's better to provide a single and consistent RFC for both.

There is a draft RFC for this that Sara and I have each worked on a
bit: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reflectionparameter.typehint