Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:80299
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.173 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <14F63BD9-73FD-49A3-9EA2-48FE35DB915C@ajf.me>
References: <14F63BD9-73FD-49A3-9EA2-48FE35DB915C@ajf.me>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 23:35:39 -0800
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU627fBiVW-gpb8pZgtJ8X3wJKyrWOgoDHjz73k6e9ZiAw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me>
Cc: Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RESULT] [RFC] PHP 5.7
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote:
> Good evening,
>
> Normally I just reply to [VOTE] threads when a vote ends, but Pierre said=
 making a separate thread in future would be a good idea, and I see no real=
 harm in it. This way it=E2=80=99ll catch the attention of people who don=
=E2=80=99t read all replies to a thread.
>
> I=E2=80=99m actually closing this vote a little late, it should=E2=80=99v=
e closed a bit before 3pm GMT, but I assumed the vote had been opened in th=
e evening. No harm done.
>
> The vote on the PHP 5.7 RFC has closed. By 19 votes to 14, the RFC has be=
en rejected. This means we won=E2=80=99t be having a PHP 5.7 release, unles=
s another RFC is made and voted on.
>
> The RFC and vote totals are here: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php57
>
> Thank you everyone for your time!


too bad.

And please, anyone, do not come up with "let add some warning in
5.6.x", please. do. not. We want to make migration and forward
compatible code harder to see? let assume it and at least follow this
part of the release process RFC.

--=20
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org