Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:80267 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 24958 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2015 09:40:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Jan 2015 09:40:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=markus@fischer.name; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=markus@fischer.name; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain fischer.name from 62.179.121.45 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: markus@fischer.name X-Host-Fingerprint: 62.179.121.45 fep25.mx.upcmail.net Solaris 10 (beta) Received: from [62.179.121.45] ([62.179.121.45:54019] helo=fep25.mx.upcmail.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6F/60-21915-D605EA45 for ; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 04:39:58 -0500 Received: from edge02.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.237]) by viefep25-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.05.05 201-2260-151-110-20120111) with ESMTP id <20150108093953.HSVM16167.viefep25-int.chello.at@edge02.upcmail.net> for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 10:39:53 +0100 Received: from mail02.home ([213.47.1.174]) by edge02.upcmail.net with edge id dMfr1p0073lFLNl01MfrET; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:39:52 +0100 X-SourceIP: 213.47.1.174 Received: from mail02.home ([192.168.1.14] helo=lv426.local) by mail02.home with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Y99ZB-0006Im-CS for internals@lists.php.net; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:39:52 +0100 Message-ID: <54AE505B.7090107@fischer.name> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:39:39 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <54ADACAF.3050609@catseye.org> <1420679648.28792.13.camel@kuechenschabe> In-Reply-To: <1420679648.28792.13.camel@kuechenschabe> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "scanner01.home", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 08.01.15 02:14, Johannes Schlüter wrote: > On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 17:01 -0500, Mark Montague wrote: >> I'd like to start an RFC (see the draft proposal at the end of this >> message) for adding >> journald support to PHP on Linux systems that use systemd. This message >> is to >> measure reaction to the intended proposal prior to requesting RFC karma. > > I believe the sd_journal_* functions could go in a PECL version, for the > logging I'd love if logging could be cleanup in a way that we have a > good internal API for internal use as well as integrates with userlevel > expectations (-> PSR 3 Log) [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] journald support for Linux systems that use systemd From: markus@fischer.name (Markus Fischer) On 08.01.15 02:14, Johannes Schlüter wrote: > On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 17:01 -0500, Mark Montague wrote: >> I'd like to start an RFC (see the draft proposal at the end of this >> message) for adding >> journald support to PHP on Linux systems that use systemd. This message >> is to >> measure reaction to the intended proposal prior to requesting RFC karma. > > I believe the sd_journal_* functions could go in a PECL version, for the > logging I'd love if logging could be cleanup in a way that we have a > good internal API for internal use as well as integrates with userlevel > expectations (-> PSR 3 Log) That would have been my reaction too, but looking at the diff it plays on the same level as the "syslog" logging, i.e. it's integral in the system in parts where a PECL extensions couldn't reach ... - Markus