Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:80156
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain fischer.name from 62.179.121.36 cause and error)
Message-ID: <54A98404.9040702@fischer.name>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 19:18:44 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <41D5BB0B-73AF-488E-968D-90B2878E3178@ajf.me>	<CAEZPtU79=VX1Scm6vVn-9iuHD=qqRoPMrsR4Ymqd9=QQeQbRCg@mail.gmail.com>	<360F9366-07C2-4C7A-AC3C-D482AFDD9838@ajf.me>	<CAOjCV8wshLQJYqRPXS7wEodwhkMK-_W0qvxzNMe1F=SYe8svmA@mail.gmail.com>	<93B11897-3B8E-4D71-A8EB-A2D67B5446E9@ajf.me> <CAEZPtU6YoDNf1uRxebAbQ=bceSL-GNa0ow+kJTiAx4vyOA6C+g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEZPtU6YoDNf1uRxebAbQ=bceSL-GNa0ow+kJTiAx4vyOA6C+g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam_score: -2.9
X-Spam_score_int: -28
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "scanner01.home", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  On 04.01.15 04:43, Pierre Joye wrote:> >> I agree with your
    sentiments about data loss, but I am reluctant to > deviate much from the
    behaviour of internal functions to avoid the > inconsistency that plagued
    the previous RFC. > > Right, but this is what I would expect. Am I the only
    one? [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                             [score: 0.0000]
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Scalar Type Hints
From: markus@fischer.name (Markus Fischer)

On 04.01.15 04:43, Pierre Joye wrote:>
>> I agree with your sentiments about data loss, but I am reluctant to
> deviate much from the behaviour of internal functions to avoid the
> inconsistency that plagued the previous RFC.
> 
> Right, but this is what I would expect. Am I the only one?

Definitely not; since strict types would elevate such problems that's my
preference anyway.

- Markus