Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:80152 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 8134 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2015 16:06:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Jan 2015 16:06:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ajf@ajf.me; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ajf@ajf.me; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ajf.me designates 192.64.116.200 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ajf@ajf.me X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.64.116.200 imap1-2.ox.privateemail.com Received: from [192.64.116.200] ([192.64.116.200:49592] helo=imap1-2.ox.privateemail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CE/E0-02442-90569A45 for ; Sun, 04 Jan 2015 11:06:33 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016B5B0008B; Sun, 4 Jan 2015 11:06:30 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap1.ox.privateemail.com Received: from mail.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap1.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id zDKb7zMk_OLR; Sun, 4 Jan 2015 11:06:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.13] (unknown [94.13.96.117]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F207EB00087; Sun, 4 Jan 2015 11:06:28 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\)) In-Reply-To: <003901d027be$d1837ff0$748a7fd0$@tekwire.net> Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 16:05:47 +0000 Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: <003901d027be$d1837ff0$748a7fd0$@tekwire.net> To: francois@tekwire.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Add is_cacheable() stream-wrapper operation From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrea Faulds) Hi Fran=E7ois, > On 4 Jan 2015, at 01:36, Fran=E7ois Laupretre = wrote: >=20 > I just wrote this RFC to propose a clean way for opcode caches to = decide if > a given URI is cacheable or not : >=20 > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/streams-is-cacheable >=20 > Please comment. How would cache invalidation work? Is there already some mechanism to = handle that with streams? Thanks. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/