Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:80017
Return-Path: <leeoniya@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 71406 invoked from network); 30 Dec 2014 19:14:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 30 Dec 2014 19:14:34 -0000
X-Host-Fingerprint: 24.12.158.105 unknown  
Received: from [24.12.158.105] ([24.12.158.105:9881] helo=localhost.localdomain)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 71/F3-46187-999F2A45 for <smalyshev@gmail.com>; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 14:14:34 -0500
To: internals@lists.php.net,Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com>, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me>
Message-ID: <54A2F996.1010200@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 13:14:30 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: Kris Craig <kris.craig@gmail.com>, 
 George Bond <happy.melon.wiki+gb@gmail.com>,
 Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>, Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net>, 
 Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <BA325242-7C6C-421E-80FC-9C239C09306A@ajf.me> <54A261A8.4000707@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <54A261A8.4000707@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Posted-By: 24.12.158.105
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE][RFC] PHP 5.7
From: leeoniya@gmail.com (Leon Sorokin)

On 12/30/2014 2:26 AM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:

> I still haven't achieved a proper understanding of what 5.7 would
> actually include (so far the only real BC thing mentioned that it can
> warn about is the switch thing, and IMHO making the new minor just
> because of that makes little sense, of course I'm not counting
> non-accepted RFCs since otherwise there's like 40 of them), so I intend
> to vote no, but if somebody really sees something substantial that I
> missed, please point me out, as I am not opposed to the idea of 5.7 just
> don't see any practical content for it for now.

Would the unassociation or deprecation-for-unassociation of the ternary 
'?' (discussed in another thread [1]) be appropriate for the 5.7? Kris 
Craig mentioned he would write up an RFC for this when he has a chance.

[1] 
http://grokbase.com/t/php/php-internals/14cdp789nk/fix-incorrect-ternary-associativity-for-7-0

thanks,
Leon