Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:79872
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.169 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F065A925-72C5-4190-A9A0-F41A9C412AB0@gmail.com>
References: <CAFp73Xu1WPEHm6osisESBQ0vx0v3z=pcdfYrQ92EdBMUbEpnNg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABRjmp825DSKr9UOtZVze0buVhaU-KetCjv9z0=GGSymrVZ+Wg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFp73XvZ2-kxa45MCENT9Y2ehD1RXT4OguO=GLiVcGMx5WLwAg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABRjmp987=_3vor5UtEBXkT=XFQSFKC4_uq=VcLwpZz7zwPMQw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFp73XstgJaA3CWbWkU_yiJ74gW9gF0wRu90Jt91ckSFvnVwOw@mail.gmail.com> <F065A925-72C5-4190-A9A0-F41A9C412AB0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 22:08:22 -0200
Message-ID: <CAFp73XtmEsajbe3yJzHOWfJ_wDvDksbUuvpSftJVW8nUqcvboQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tjerk Meesters <tjerk.meesters@gmail.com>
Cc: Florian Margaine <florian@margaine.com>, PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f9cc454de31050ad6fa47
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Abstract final / Static classes
From: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com ("guilhermeblanco@gmail.com")

--001a113f9cc454de31050ad6fa47
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi everyone,

Voting is now closed.
Since this RFC required a 2/3 majority, the result is against the
implementation of this feature in PHP.
RFC is now updated and moved to withdrawn section.

Thanks,

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Tjerk Meesters <tjerk.meesters@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> > On 13 Dec 2014, at 00:35, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > RFC is updated exposing both possible usages with both explanations.
> > Hope it doesn't confuse even more.
>
> Hi, in your "As static class=E2=80=9D example, it doesn=E2=80=99t really =
demonstrate that
> you can omit the =E2=80=9Cstatic=E2=80=9D modifier from the function decl=
arations.
>
> Also, it=E2=80=99s not clear if the same applies to =E2=80=9CAs abstract =
final=E2=80=9D.
>
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Florian Margaine <florian@margaine.co=
m
> >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Le 12 d=C3=A9c. 2014 17:28, "guilhermeblanco@gmail.com" <
> >> guilhermeblanco@gmail.com> a =C3=A9crit :
> >>>
> >>> It's part of the history of that RFC, accessible here:
> >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/abstract_final_class?rev=3D1417060830
> >>>
> >>
> >> But then it isn't clear as of right now. What is proposed? The example=
?
> >> The votes? What does `final` has to do with `static`?
> >>
> >> I'm confused.
> >>
> >>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Florian Margaine <
> florian@margaine.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 5:12 PM, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com <
> >> guilhermeblanco@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi internals,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> After a good round of discussion, I updated the original "abstract
> >> final
> >>>>> class" proposal into a "static class" proposal.
> >>>>> However, I kept both patches online so it's up to voters decide whi=
ch
> >> one
> >>>>> it could be implemented.
> >>>>> Patches are now complete and voting phase starts now and will be
> active
> >>>>> until 12/19/2014.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As this is a language update, it requires 2/3 pro or against the
> >> feature.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/abstract_final_class
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Why does the example use `final`?
> >>>>
> >>>> final static class Environment
> >>>> {
> >>>>    private static $rootDirectory =3D '/var/www/project';
> >>>>    public static function getRootDirectory()
> >>>>    {
> >>>>        return self::$rootDirectory;
> >>>>    }
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> Also, the vote presents 2 options. The RFC is in a weird state where
> it
> >> mentions "abstract final" but doesn't explain anything about them. The
> >> votes don't seem to be what the example is...
> >>>>
> >>>> Could you edit your RFC?
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Happy voting!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Guilherme Blanco
> >>>>> MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com
> >>>>> GTalk: guilhermeblanco
> >>>>> Toronto - ON/Canada
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> --
> >>>> Florian Margaine
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Guilherme Blanco
> >>> MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com
> >>> GTalk: guilhermeblanco
> >>> Toronto - ON/Canada
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Florian
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Guilherme Blanco
> > MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com
> > GTalk: guilhermeblanco
> > Toronto - ON/Canada
>
>


--=20
Guilherme Blanco
MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com
GTalk: guilhermeblanco
Toronto - ON/Canada

--001a113f9cc454de31050ad6fa47--