Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:79838 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 50078 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2014 03:50:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Dec 2014 03:50:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=xinchen.h@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=laruence@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 209.85.215.54 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: xinchen.h@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.54 mail-la0-f54.google.com Received: from [209.85.215.54] ([209.85.215.54:47143] helo=mail-la0-f54.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F6/50-48452-67346945 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 22:50:15 -0500 Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id pv20so2588453lab.27 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 19:50:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=VZGhBZ3IcYzrIj+2kQsPcVKhvTsrwmoDkQYa6aWkNmw=; b=QG3G7WVhwmfxdPsde3P7cOVRA5nPt1GJGjp205erW/5u1kxPuQYNBkfT6u6bpin/CE t4JYVcH0Tmid/VhSb5SIfJtDIhmm3yz+EP5A4Lt5njM+4UeI8qRFo48jO3EwqVUSj4Cw N2IkDEjzSw9xz/MibqPK6WeOyKK8xAj4NE4EgsYI3TC3BnUNDtvVELokEzk04mPnlV2X yETXYQqWXJ9PWPzNKDBjRTTA3PX6/wdOcWbJQWDFQiGQnHkkSfiZQB2HA+uSv1jmAcdJ auzn0roAHaHDwjnXNeVi8c2mNABiOpO0TaZcsIkryzMkFhguKoEi9e6hj/xn+9aQc+Lj PvvA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm9otjCr4b7krOSTDkwNnUjmQtkhgg8fuxqIvivQslRxDAUZ9/putd5eSh5g/lEW9Rw/uIXYRXILPPSTd4onNEbe1vXT8d0yAjBMgajZ81+/N3G0kPmFdIunbI96e+41oOTTgokVrGnY+tAoiBP3HRNX3B2IQ== X-Received: by 10.112.63.99 with SMTP id f3mr15205040lbs.47.1419133811432; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 19:50:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-la0-f53.google.com (mail-la0-f53.google.com. [209.85.215.53]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id e5sm3990035laf.44.2014.12.20.19.50.10 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 20 Dec 2014 19:50:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id gm9so2669868lab.12 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 19:50:09 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.112.12.65 with SMTP id w1mr15491064lbb.68.1419133809880; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 19:50:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.64.176 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 19:49:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 11:49:49 +0800 Message-ID: To: Pierre Joye Cc: Nikita Popov , PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] Remove deprecated functionality in PHP 7 From: laruence@php.net (Xinchen Hui) Hey: On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: > > On Dec 21, 2014 10:23 AM, "Xinchen Hui" wrote: >> >> Hey: >> > >> I am strongly against to remove ext/mysql >> >> that means, all wordpress users/maintainers, will not able to upgrade >> to PHP7 without pain. > > https://make.wordpress.org/core/2014/04/07/mysql-in-wordpress-3-9/ > > Basically wp and mysql are wrong arguments. we have upgrade issues, they also have that.. I know lots of sites are based on old version wordpress, and they did lot's of custom developing on it.. they will not able to upgrade to any new wordpress.. > > Also last time we discussed that there were a couple of oppositions to > remove deprecated features in 7. yes.. > > My take is that we should not have a mass vote but options for each feature. > Also if we do not remove deprecated features we may as a well remove the > deprecation as it makes no sense to keep it if we never actually remove the > affected features. I agree.. for ext/mysql, I think it's okey to remove the deprecated warning.. thanks > > Cheers, > Pierre -- Xinchen Hui @Laruence http://www.laruence.com/