Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:79834 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 43859 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2014 03:22:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Dec 2014 03:22:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=laruence@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=xinchen.h@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 209.85.217.173 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: xinchen.h@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.217.173 mail-lb0-f173.google.com Received: from [209.85.217.173] ([209.85.217.173:61357] helo=mail-lb0-f173.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 1C/91-32072-B0D36945 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 22:22:52 -0500 Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id z12so2482472lbi.4 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 19:22:48 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=cJFTE/MERPX/hOvR3HvCMaoCxsfanCrh/XpMILpnnLI=; b=cnK5Wxf7EdVEFu6OL9GVjTBAx9j/Nxjz5KwKVZCK2tO+kEW7hI41QpDLbOuIxK2iHZ qafJVglMPeh8DKihiLBApfG9n795mMFG5PsSukvuAWZP8Isn/UFdTGWaWr4ux3zfxK/H FPh/QQJvjR1IfVRPK/QeoH/2kWp2CMRjxDI71RbEH7XsiRzW/pmUfSfaA1xk3H/8TeQ6 5Hs+abXlzdbG5c+coKQNSQ+lliTwhZNjZZcY2hNOcfjSA5d7iZIB7pEgVGAESoVz2u6I SNlq/JqNiA1b/e+tgNuBmksAIgdVYGsLnLC0KpfC8WkKcZoo8ZlRDR/wSwsNex4gqFj9 Ny+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlIpbUdF7IgTM4bvlv1MLe/o//RCJcbPKXk+/UQFRE9IYClSHemlee64chYS8nRHhIBxpN0LgRKOZVC70t0AHQ9wMBuDDSI0q30qMhMI4ydl7kEaEPs6WDDMGLg1N9SAYKgXwBe9lAYaNs/ZYLRFx+1SQp85A== X-Received: by 10.112.167.228 with SMTP id zr4mr15528773lbb.20.1419132168595; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 19:22:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com (mail-lb0-f172.google.com. [209.85.217.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jf3sm3975468lbc.44.2014.12.20.19.22.47 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 20 Dec 2014 19:22:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id u10so2529355lbd.31 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 19:22:46 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.152.25.129 with SMTP id c1mr8480640lag.65.1419132166609; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 19:22:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.64.176 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 19:22:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 11:22:26 +0800 Message-ID: To: Nikita Popov Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] Remove deprecated functionality in PHP 7 From: laruence@php.net (Xinchen Hui) Hey: On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Nikita Popov wrote: > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Nikita Popov wrote: > >> Hi internals! >> >> We currently have a number of deprecated features, which we likely want to >> remove in PHP 7. I've created a tracking RFC listing deprecated >> functionality (if I missed something, please tell): >> >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/remove_deprecated_functionality_in_php7 >> >> I expect many of these are no-brainers (like assigning new by-reference), >> but other items like removal of ext/mysql may need additional consideration. >> >> Unless there are items that are particularly contested, I'd like to handle >> the bulk of these in a single vote and only have separate votes for >> ext/ereg and ext/mysql, as these are arguably more intrusive. >> >> Thanks, >> Nikita >> > > I'd like to start voting on this sometime soon. I've updated the RFC to > include more info on some individual deprecated functionality and also > created blocks for individual votes. I've created seven instead of the > original three. If you want me to split off some point into an extra vote, > please say so. I am strongly against to remove ext/mysql that means, all wordpress users/maintainers, will not able to upgrade to PHP7 without pain. thanks > > I've also found that in https://wiki.php.net/rfc/incompat_ctx the vote > already decided that it should be removed in the next version (-> PHP 7.0). > So, anyone have a problem with dropping that right away without doing a > second round of voting? > > Nikita > > RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/remove_deprecated_functionality_in_php7 -- Xinchen Hui @Laruence http://www.laruence.com/