Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:79796
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.174 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <5491FEA1.9070206@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 22:07:29 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <548FEE87.7020602@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1412171204040.4080@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl> <5491B636.1010707@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5491B636.1010707@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Objects as Keys
From: rowan.collins@gmail.com (Rowan Collins)

On 17/12/2014 16:58, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> I wonder why you opened voting on this, before resolving the "Open
>> Issues":
>>
>> Open Issues
>>
>>      Should SplFixedArray support object indexes?
>>      Should SplObjectStorage support calling __hash for an object if it exists?
> These issues are not part of the RFC's target, they are possible
> improvements to SPL *if* the RFC is accepted. I don't want to spend time
> on them if it is not. If it is, then we can see how to improve SPL
> classes to support it, but it's a different questions from the main RFC.
> I just mentioned it in order to not forget these things need to be
> discussed if the RFC is accepted.
>

That makes sense. They should probably have gone under "Future Scope" 
rather than "Open Issues" in that case, looking at the wording on the 
template, but not a big deal.

-- 
Rowan Collins
[IMSoP]