Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:79786
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.169 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <5491B636.1010707@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 08:58:30 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>
CC: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <548FEE87.7020602@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1412171204040.4080@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1412171204040.4080@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Objects as Keys
From: smalyshev@gmail.com (Stanislav Malyshev)

Hi!

> I wonder why you opened voting on this, before resolving the "Open 
> Issues":
> 
> Open Issues
> 
>     Should SplFixedArray support object indexes?
>     Should SplObjectStorage support calling __hash for an object if it exists?

These issues are not part of the RFC's target, they are possible
improvements to SPL *if* the RFC is accepted. I don't want to spend time
on them if it is not. If it is, then we can see how to improve SPL
classes to support it, but it's a different questions from the main RFC.
I just mentioned it in order to not forget these things need to be
discussed if the RFC is accepted.

-- 
Stas Malyshev
smalyshev@gmail.com