Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:79727 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 45727 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2014 16:17:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Dec 2014 16:17:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tyra3l@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tyra3l@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.180 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.212.180 mail-wi0-f180.google.com Received: from [209.85.212.180] ([209.85.212.180:56033] helo=mail-wi0-f180.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 53/E5-12185-61B50945 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:17:26 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id n3so13077823wiv.7 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 08:17:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=YFbZVtqznHZREBq9KAN823HcWiv7OsjNRnzBeMUsH0w=; b=viwfcOEPIbCZmQCMgV7h7IwTYyZDWksP1fP3SMg3Ucw8LnHAq6YwUiwOTpcdYwfaWG dnnJFrisT+63SNOT1M+/iBcGNCG6bE98Ed+mou5dxz+x0f85i+Txs6yjeMIdSRq13UsA 33ZFiwZuPAqA1ihf8UDlwZoHnqyPTZ7llcIfNz5VwVjRUkgIrvFbv5Yc/akYdSJB0Zgx d2rpcvawiijvNjO4M+S7hWYFbEXilGehj4DgsqYcIEUi2Jn4qGcWnDTiY0MaFUt7YJ2Z MC/UpWAvOV03FNE7qqwQTlQl4tnAUAKa2IPr3kPSfulBU2Ig8TRzUkRj+ytqbEomep4e a4kA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.7.198 with SMTP id l6mr6238633wia.26.1418746643622; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 08:17:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.88.33 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 08:17:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <12C43B3F-49A1-47A2-BFF6-3B66C8B6EF4C@ajf.me> References: <8C1EFD82-CFE0-4D01-9231-2A1658B182A6@ajf.me> <548FE4A8.4040909@beccati.com> <6879A58C-458B-459D-97D3-1A73663E1A0E@ajf.me> <54900F01.2080309@beccati.com> <24343159-F6CC-4C11-AD8B-CFB608A87339@ajf.me> <549017B6.8000009@beccati.com> <12C43B3F-49A1-47A2-BFF6-3B66C8B6EF4C@ajf.me> Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:17:23 +0100 Message-ID: To: Andrea Faulds Cc: Matteo Beccati , Xinchen Hui , PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044287c0b833c8050a57b151 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] PHP 5.7 From: tyra3l@gmail.com (Ferenc Kovacs) --f46d044287c0b833c8050a57b151 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote: > > Hey Matteo, > > > On 16 Dec 2014, at 11:29, Matteo Beccati wrote: > > > > This is what I meant when I previously mentioned seeing RFCs targeting > 5.7. I understand what you say and I do wholeheartedly agree with you. > > > > However if one would have to strictly follow what has been voted, such > features should be backported to whatever becomes 5.7, if any. Perhaps th= e > 5.7 RFC could explicitly states what is (not) going to happen wrt those > RFCs. > > I think it=E2=80=99s pretty clear in stating 5.7 will have no new feature= s. > > I don't think that we have a consensus on that yet, I would put that up for voting, but I do agree that there shouldn't be any major features like what we used to have in a minor version(and I can understand the reasoning from Zeev to even push the small features to 7.0 instead so people have more reason to upgrade). --=20 Ferenc Kov=C3=A1cs @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu --f46d044287c0b833c8050a57b151--