Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:79478
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 209.85.220.169 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAFp73XsJQ89ijz7ZE6UQ3u2+G2a8gEQTjjrP6c292H08SgenEA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFp73Xtmw6PVxN0XaKkjJC5M5PU-W=prpYDob5aXHuQzE5dwNw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALWK-fj1Yk_VbLcBv4Oz5DzruxfXe6EJ1_9ambvU+1Qpw6HMSg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALWK-fjghgAv3=W2=f_Vwpjf3+hBMvMsdWKR9LCefjdsG3t9WQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFp73XsJQ89ijz7ZE6UQ3u2+G2a8gEQTjjrP6c292H08SgenEA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 21:25:26 +0400
Message-ID: <CA+9eiLt11gDDdvH21xysQkJ0aJnVoYTnXhR_Ep7Lc7NtivHNyw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "guilhermeblanco@gmail.com" <guilhermeblanco@gmail.com>
Cc: Damien Tournoud <damz@damz.org>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b33da245870150509b7b6ed
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Zend language parser improvements
From: dmitry@zend.com (Dmitry Stogov)

--047d7b33da245870150509b7b6ed
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I'm not against the patch, I'm actually indifferent.
Lets wait for Nikita's opinion.

I took just a quick look over "static class" RFC.
I'll need to think more about it.

Thanks. Dmitry.

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 5:18 PM, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com <
guilhermeblanco@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Dmitry,
>
> As I said, these patches are not huge beneficial, but enablers. Enablers in
> the sense that further development over class/interface/trait simplified.
> It's not a short win benefit, but a mid/long term.
>
> Also defer currently checks done in zend_compile to Bison (such as trait
> extends and implements), addresses small inconsistencies (such as an
> extension class that extend an interface) and also easier to comprehend for
> newcomers (such as trait flag value).
>
> Now development that happens over this (such as abstract final/static
> class, package private class) become easy, as you can see in PR for static
> class for example.
>
> Cheers,
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Damien Tournoud <damz@damz.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Damien Tournoud <damz@damz.org> wrote:
> > > PDO statement should not be made final, or this is a breaking language
> > > change (requiring an RFC and a 2/3 majority).
> >
> > I see from the PR that it's PDORow, not PDOStatement. That one is not
> > actually exposed as such to userspace, so it is fine.
> >
> > Damien
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Guilherme Blanco
> MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com
> GTalk: guilhermeblanco
> Toronto - ON/Canada
>

--047d7b33da245870150509b7b6ed--