Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:79306
Return-Path: <jrbasso@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 24305 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2014 04:48:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 29 Nov 2014 04:48:39 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=jrbasso@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=jrbasso@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.42 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: jrbasso@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.216.42 mail-qa0-f42.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.216.42] ([209.85.216.42:47697] helo=mail-qa0-f42.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 86/50-22603-52059745 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 23:48:38 -0500
Received: by mail-qa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id j7so5233110qaq.15
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 20:48:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=3hjVGsxkBO6/7bEXC177iSm5x2gX7F1GYTc3pKJYL2c=;
        b=QItMHmEt4fvINwU/OPoFkXFlYKh41Oe9pEmv90GJA9Eoyk3jSP+Hd6EIpAq8ZIjVxe
         rijKNBp2wkbMUR/bAYDHDUIX+pdiczJvuWrf005oBxHYsAU6BE123y8vJeLiOu/3GnNa
         3TCPnSeEBlPEtnf4VphXewKrWVCeGAiZ+5Js0KM03i7nNI44urSwpUrrXJ1BpIKmI0+9
         YjrOQZRfu2i2l7yOxqDQGF2eC1QosNfTamBcQW7+wjpl8/7U0XZqdtjvDUFVV7rnI6+s
         d1FLyqpkAPKdFbxU6JjW4pM95hrHh8UWgPFKAFpSxc1B1VUHwfE8IS1jVvHux1gRWr0c
         GC1w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.42.135 with SMTP id c7mr66150355qga.7.1417236514374;
 Fri, 28 Nov 2014 20:48:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.140.28.52 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 20:48:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAFMT4Np3rnXnpixNhcw1D-5QG0kQA4ME7Pg=mg1hsmh9d1gY9g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+sv8zB4TC_N_cZ6W_CkGZLXhFNTw23z-R197qEOT1v-VR4ksQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH-PCH7=SZ710Pz5o80YSNRiAyRHivnoYt-A_OZbApDH7Jxc3Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEKnhAFrSd0dMMER6rYpw2Y-SS4wMF1SLS83C-44RdiYdg+HHg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGAGxbbzM1tMdsRSho_NAkf0aHd3gMTuQDur8-gi=5t5Lx3tgg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+sv8zCffhmWOZnEZ37L3c8JNGBnne6qnuEz+HhWoy2Ruc=UeQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEKnhAHRyzegk5JtT8XOHj1QunYSWn9Gf3L-wFJXkF5yXtpErA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH-PCH5Hy28_pYiTvTF_O1-0NmeDUbKCyZc2oBP-7pCSF3HjBw@mail.gmail.com>
	<7CC00F2C-CE88-40A1-9A60-866F4A02F03B@ajf.me>
	<CAH-PCH6DsN0q3711K9s2WBfoNVh=Q+C3-Xhx2OZZfAT8z943HA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+sv8zAMB3irtTEvJJ0B0bZqZNEokbvxyd6Vtvzi14KKj7DYGQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+sv8zDWFijM24COf6HHKsFHyfpCAr7L2QsjMv4jtVRo7OFLCQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFMT4Np3rnXnpixNhcw1D-5QG0kQA4ME7Pg=mg1hsmh9d1gY9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 23:48:34 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+sv8zCCaD2tNANuij0BDApEHFSF1Dz0cyjO46Zi1wDmAMDz9A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Levi Morrison <levim@php.net>
Cc: Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com>, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me>, Jakub Zelenka <bukka@php.net>, 
	Chris Wright <cw@daverandom.com>, PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1139838e008c550508f817af
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Add a new flag for json_encode
From: jrbasso@gmail.com (Juan Basso)

--001a1139838e008c550508f817af
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Levi,

From what I understood it is a consensus to apply the change to PHP 5.6 as
it is (new flag and disabled by default). There is no consensus about how
should be in PHP 7, but was agreed to discuss that later.

On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Levi Morrison <levim@php.net> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Juan Basso <jrbasso@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Over 20 days since the last comment and seems there is a consensus about
> > accept it to the next 5.6 patch version, right? Can it be merged?
>
> After reading over the thread, there doesn't seem to be a consensus; I
> am not sure how you arrived at this conclusion. If I have misread the
> thread and there is indeed a consensus then I apologize for
> contributing noise.
>

--001a1139838e008c550508f817af--