Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:79032
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 209.85.220.179 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <546B0F62.1090705@gmail.com>
References: <546B0F62.1090705@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 14:25:12 +0400
Message-ID: <CA+9eiLsyGN_z8hyxNFn3VPXWb5Gd0txB9Ks=sqzGxzh4USHudw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307c9ab65b3104050847be66
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Default constructors
From: dmitry@zend.com (Dmitry Stogov)

--20cf307c9ab65b3104050847be66
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Stas,

Sorry, I didn't follow all the discussions.
I think the idea is good.
I'm not sure about implementation.
Additional check for ZEND_NULL_FUNCTION in DO_FCALL may be expensive.
I think it must be better to use special predefined function (see
"zend_pass_function" usage in zend_vm_def.h).

Thanks. Dmitry.

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi!
>
> I'd like to propose the following RFC, which in short would allow any
> method to call parent ctor (and some other methods) even if such is not
> explicitly defined:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/default_ctor
>
> The reasons are outlined in detail in the RFC and here:
> http://php100.wordpress.com/2014/11/04/default-constructors/
>
> The patch is not finished yet but seems to be working fine, I'll add it
> to the RFC this week as soon as I finish it. I'd like to put idea out
> there in the meantime and hear what everybody thinks about it.
>
> Thanks,
> Stas
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>

--20cf307c9ab65b3104050847be66--