Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:78868 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 29998 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2014 09:13:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Nov 2014 09:13:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@beccati.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@beccati.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain beccati.com designates 176.9.114.167 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@beccati.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 176.9.114.167 spritz.beccati.com Received: from [176.9.114.167] ([176.9.114.167:37827] helo=mail.beccati.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E3/91-17159-233D1645 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 04:13:22 -0500 Received: (qmail 22984 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2014 09:13:17 -0000 Received: from home.beccati.com (HELO ?192.168.1.202?) (88.149.176.119) by mail.beccati.com with SMTP; 11 Nov 2014 09:13:17 -0000 Message-ID: <5461D322.2000204@beccati.com> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:13:06 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kalle Sommer Nielsen CC: Internals , skettler@php.net References: <5461C920.8050006@beccati.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] gzopen vs gzopen64 From: php@beccati.com (Matteo Beccati) On 11/11/2014 09:57, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote: > Hi Matteo > > 2014-11-11 9:30 GMT+01:00 Matteo Beccati : >> Hi, >> >> I wasn't aware of this particular issue, until a few minutes ago (got a >> bug report from a user). Any reason why: >> >> https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=53829 >> >> is still pending? > > Seems like a weird inconsistentcy to me, and I think the "alias" fix > is the proper fix here for BC. Yes, I just don't have a working machine to test it atm. I can fire up a VM, but it will take time. > If you merge it (or anyone else), please remember to mark it as a doc > bug after so we can note such in the manual (didn't look, but I doubt > it is there else I'm sure this issue was more known) Sounds like a good idea. Cheers -- Matteo Beccati Development & Consulting - http://www.beccati.com/