Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:78679
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 209.85.218.41 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGAGxbY+2G8zOWkHW7t_QhvFSFM=QLY7tSWJpGc8tAgpraLm-w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGAGxbY+2G8zOWkHW7t_QhvFSFM=QLY7tSWJpGc8tAgpraLm-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 00:13:25 +0400
Message-ID: <CA+9eiLvKj9rxa-QaHWuUVJ38qbJ_AKu=VYXFNmaZtH3VEeb1_w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chris Wright <daverandom@php.net>
Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d42647cbed905070e18d0
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Additional splat operator usage
From: dmitry@zend.com (Dmitry Stogov)

--047d7b5d42647cbed905070e18d0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I like the idea, especially list($a, $b, ...$c) = ...
Looks like Prolog's [A, B | C] = ..., unfortunately it won't provide the
same semantic and performance.
Implementation needs to be reviewed, but I think it must not affect
existing opcodes.

Thanks. Dmitry.

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 1:45 AM, Chris Wright <daverandom@php.net> wrote:

> Good evening list,
>
> I'd like to open discussion a relatively simple and clear-cut RFC, either
> people will like it or they won't, there isn't a lot more to say here than
> what's in the RFC so please have a read.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/additional-splat-usage
>
> Thanks, Chris
>

--047d7b5d42647cbed905070e18d0--