Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:78612 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 66525 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2014 07:49:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Nov 2014 07:49:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.216.170 mail-qc0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.216.170] ([209.85.216.170:38386] helo=mail-qc0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id DE/02-24107-E0588545 for ; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 02:49:34 -0500 Received: by mail-qc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id l6so10637192qcy.29 for ; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 23:49:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=OUXrLEO225ewmx5Rm7mnAtSVUb2klrMV2zJ/20ot63w=; b=dh02jGYphCXcmllE1C9QwNmwVnQAMhxpXKHVnbgFcUcgxLbPcMqhVchQ7tGVRnX5Sx v56hMAzyDvnIGcAxynL4iHUf3Jjv5d4/OSHbJOpdrtRfqqCv8UEkd9ShITl8Pv/EopXM GtKiTUK7vH/xFEZpZKPmG8x3O3JgHE883G9TBXzYu7lKyt/7rQmskfeRGMCmM1Bxv+dl 6lBwTiYndBGC690rC2DtVYT4O6O/5AnOHSKdbm4YLNJ/8HdBmkY08FtDjRzyNsWJkHow WrwX7vE8EBr3GMuzLHm2s0bEk6exBg9UprvRzIxsWL9uJ4OVMbPFVZjbFKt7kCFlEycx q0Tw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.151.207 with SMTP id d15mr74017196qaw.4.1415087371515; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 23:49:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.89.149 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 23:49:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.89.149 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 23:49:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <5457AF2F.90808@php.net> <5457BDB7.8070701@garfieldtech.com> Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 14:49:31 +0700 Message-ID: To: Levi Morrison Cc: PHP internals , Larry Garfield Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e015373b61b1996050703b447 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Annotation PHP 7 From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) --089e015373b61b1996050703b447 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Nov 4, 2014 8:50 AM, "Levi Morrison" wrote: > Whether the annotation is in a comment or not, the idea of changing > behavior at runtime based on the annotation is pretty magical. I > highly discourage using this type of feature whether it's in a comment > or not. > > I will certainly vote no on any RFC on this subject, as I see it as > being significantly more harmful than helpful. This is exactly what I meant. We have almost all major projects using them but we may consider not adding them natively because we find it magic, ugly, whatever. As I do consider personal tastes important, there are times where we should listen to our users. --089e015373b61b1996050703b447--