Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:78601
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGAGxbY+2G8zOWkHW7t_QhvFSFM=QLY7tSWJpGc8tAgpraLm-w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGAGxbY+2G8zOWkHW7t_QhvFSFM=QLY7tSWJpGc8tAgpraLm-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 23:00:23 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPwsocFYpUK_NcWXs4M0qh_0RTofZHToukrMsabF45GU2P-3Wg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chris Wright <daverandom@php.net>
Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Additional splat operator usage
From: leight@gmail.com (Leigh)

On 3 November 2014 22:45, Chris Wright <daverandom@php.net> wrote:
> Good evening list,
>
> I'd like to open discussion a relatively simple and clear-cut RFC, either
> people will like it or they won't, there isn't a lot more to say here than
> what's in the RFC so please have a read.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/additional-splat-usage
>
> Thanks, Chris


I remember asking Nikita about whether this was possible during the
original splat RFC. Sticking to my guns, I think this makes sense.