Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:78597 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 838 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2014 22:04:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Nov 2014 22:04:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ajf@ajf.me; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ajf@ajf.me; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ajf.me designates 198.187.29.245 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ajf@ajf.me X-Host-Fingerprint: 198.187.29.245 imap11-3.ox.privateemail.com Received: from [198.187.29.245] ([198.187.29.245:60168] helo=imap11-3.ox.privateemail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id EE/64-10620-EEBF7545 for ; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 17:04:30 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104738800EB for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 17:04:28 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap11.ox.privateemail.com Received: from mail.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap11.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Hsq_P_cuXVfx for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 17:04:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from oa-res-26-28.wireless.abdn.ac.uk (oa-res-26-28.wireless.abdn.ac.uk [137.50.26.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD2208800D5 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 17:04:27 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\)) In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 22:04:25 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: To: PHP internals X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Closure::call and Function Referencing as Closures From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrea Faulds) > On 3 Aug 2014, at 22:50, Andrea Faulds wrote: >=20 > Good evening, >=20 > I am proposing two new RFCs. As they are both inter-related and = complementary, with the second having the first as a prerequisite, I=92m = making just a single email to cover both: >=20 > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/closure_apply > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/function_referencing I am withdrawing the function referencing RFC. I think the syntax is too = ambiguous and it doesn=92t really solve anything well. The confusion it = would create is not worth the benefit. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/