Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:78594
Return-Path: <damz@damz.org>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 94487 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2014 21:28:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 3 Nov 2014 21:28:17 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=damz@damz.org; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=damz@damz.org; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain damz.org designates 209.85.217.175 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: damz@damz.org
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.217.175 mail-lb0-f175.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.217.175] ([209.85.217.175:60810] helo=mail-lb0-f175.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id F5/43-10620-E63F7545 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 16:28:15 -0500
Received: by mail-lb0-f175.google.com with SMTP id n15so2093293lbi.6
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 13:28:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=damz.org; s=google;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=TuAK95x0zFqKnSjgnRKqhvvVWhLgvQhJSSUu3bRCRE4=;
        b=bylDozHTcfcjoHloXYtLIcmPMS0vLVqr7FCSlBU3+OgsvTs0pBNhirFbi2A+QgX1jr
         m4zlHL5TylYmKP+a1jZENLPKxEALqTCvTgV26CRSoispvea7q0362o7h1LA6Ml3UeMZT
         ONPELR3AouldtKvm/z8XATcHwvSbfK3N6U/Kc=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=TuAK95x0zFqKnSjgnRKqhvvVWhLgvQhJSSUu3bRCRE4=;
        b=hNG6E0/g5dnl40WlhJa1L7KogTf6jaN2ZdY0ffeQZgpISBlzks/ikgYwR5y8glFUtX
         kfIWzSWDUCpXrRxF2VJeKHJyP2QaYnA6+J9BBCwk79L9xENo1u2/v8gnu5zbYXeyU6+X
         OeHYy67lCkky5tXiyitfNGBUWYz/8mYiVYGh+fY3rgnmfhzhs6WWDh/vbN/X9pHeaffU
         SNyfICjQg63R8EUeWS/0LaE5u1e5rMMFlIJ7TLxGpgUzAG04AtflPBp12FS36IBwYuX7
         w2UywFgRT8Gh3d+8BNJkN0Wcj1af5lURFSMlAaOAKZom5vbyYGmG0dQizkBa8Fm09I0r
         lNRQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQngKic8dwHTZ87umCOHNGTNLXVzT2NqdCgJHmqa2+ADOOy+/6k1W6OwGqIgi7oNIWqO2O8s
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.87.162 with SMTP id az2mr53439841lbb.15.1415050091291;
 Mon, 03 Nov 2014 13:28:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.25.12.200 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 13:28:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [88.142.167.194]
In-Reply-To: <5457EF60.1020103@sugarcrm.com>
References: <5457EF60.1020103@sugarcrm.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 22:28:11 +0100
Message-ID: <CALWK-fj7PHAWQphASVq210kByoCsUG6Sd5--8XvGoSPjmXGyfw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Filtered unserialize()
From: damz@damz.org (Damien Tournoud)

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com> wrote:
> I'd like to put to vote my proposal about the filtered unserialize():
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/secure_unserialize

Hi,

Coming late to the discussion. Was there any discussion to make the
new argument a callback instead? Pass it the fully-qualified class
name, have it return true (the class should be loaded) or false (the
class should not be loaded). Deprecate the `unserialize_callback_func`
mechanism at the same time.

Damien