Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:78584
Return-Path: <morrison.levi@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 71176 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2014 18:53:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 3 Nov 2014 18:53:54 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=morrison.levi@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=morrison.levi@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: morrison.levi@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.176 mail-ob0-f176.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.214.176] ([209.85.214.176:39823] helo=mail-ob0-f176.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 3C/42-57494-14FC7545 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 13:53:53 -0500
Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id va2so9413178obc.21
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 10:53:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=I2UqwMwxgtWA/Q1SKavJIqAo5Ne1bfTInew0PQyiNP8=;
        b=pKcddCZl4oJ31li52rq5huhhT0qpHcvaKIgAy8jiuXDhrk7i94QnJZaLLkUIqrGiBn
         KG2XUAbRTELWO89eHvkbW4AyQZ+hG9stJW2gyZiZ4aHoYt+dhdQ/qjI+GfhCbVVjeXD1
         tQz/SWLQFisgleL3CcXMX4YmVjkUewr6LFyz5jZfyyOJy9du8AErpxXl8nEK3l0uBjl0
         YIA+QxoZeBI9oAN3A17hYwPyNoTdbTZRiAyYFAerGrfpHt9dUVlkWYZtS5iA31NpcFLh
         qrDD0hEIk2MCW8cKjQeu4rQHyimXmYEz4GKLSabkwDUk21h5kkSmQZLdBOv7nXl/6Grp
         rePQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.108.229 with SMTP id hn5mr2886040obb.51.1415040829998;
 Mon, 03 Nov 2014 10:53:49 -0800 (PST)
Sender: morrison.levi@gmail.com
Received: by 10.76.159.163 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 10:53:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <002601cff777$eb923430$c2b69c90$@tutteli.ch>
References: <002601cff777$eb923430$c2b69c90$@tutteli.ch>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 11:53:49 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9bcWYg565UfBW2nWTsyzOAPp_ko
Message-ID: <CAFMT4NqJDcek6itqAUt2iOyHd2icc-tDdWsEjiRYvG1YFcc5cw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Stoll <php@tutteli.ch>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Types on the right or on the left
From: levim@php.net (Levi Morrison)

> Thoughts?

I think you didn't follow the mailing list or read the return types
RFC carefully if you think putting the return type before the function
name is good at all. Also, why are you starting this conversation now
instead of months ago or even a couple weeks ago when I asked for
feedback on the latest return types RFC?

Lastly, I want to say that compatibility with Hack is only one
consideration of all things considered. Please don't let that guide
your thoughts too far one way or the other.