Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:78535
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 66.111.4.27 as permitted sender)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8B1B8EDB-E624-473B-92EE-76330B8DFFF1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\))
In-Reply-To: <CAL+t6cFCOz3OgYYScoGYWvHQFFFjKEQHGghwgn23xFhYX9kk6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 16:29:33 -0400
Cc: Rowan Collins <rowan.collins@gmail.com>,
 PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Message-ID: <B23AEFDD-AF47-4435-A882-F287B176EEA2@php.net>
References: <CAL+t6cGt8B+X4ptWbyo6zm_xoyBOJC4QeiH6DjCxHX11CPWm_g@mail.gmail.com> <5452B87B.5040009@garfieldtech.com> <CAL+t6cHqQL-TaurfG887qxeyeVZPCxQcnY_BrtD-oHCS196HQw@mail.gmail.com> <0B797CE3-7AFA-4330-9A98-D3CAFC6D6072@ajf.me> <CAL+t6cGanxv3dJONcECupw6Cfzup4s6At6tEcK_=Qagn67RNjw@mail.gmail.com> <5453B114.6050400@gmail.com> <CAL+t6cFCToJJGiCb8JhNe9oQws5UuBdKw+ot3rjUBQQr=7=Bxw@mail.gmail.com> <5453C250.8090803@gmail.com> <CAL+t6cEH7PPMu2G=e4NQau-iOznkG31-d187EMCDY0LFeew68g@mail.gmail.com> <CABRjmp-b1jGD1SBTxmnJFLKi++WbL4TBggijN+VfSjRjPMJYPQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAL+t6cF7t7shs78xSiBfGxZSCqh5zcU-B_WWjK5J9ebiB=PTQA@mail.gmail.com> <5453D6D5.2070705@garfieldtech.com> <CAL+t6cEyLFqQ9cRW3uiE-pRMsMEyOywAhWWDtg5zFFL-U2mogg@mail.gmail.com> <5453E492.6020304@gmail.com> <CAL+t6cE_vbjVhrgN6opoHrv1neSDCa4WZXs+BKoNTzvb80eknA@mail.gmail.com> <FB6607D7-5FCD-43FD-BF04-725451357C1B@php.net> <CAL+t6cFCOz3OgYYScoGYWvHQFFFjKEQHGghwgn23xFhYX9kk6g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sherif Ramadan <theanomaly.is@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] New Standardized HTTP Interface
From: willfitch@php.net (Will Fitch)

--Apple-Mail=_8B1B8EDB-E624-473B-92EE-76330B8DFFF1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8


> On Oct 31, 2014, at 4:21 PM, Sherif Ramadan <theanomaly.is@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>=20
>=20
>=20
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Will Fitch <willfitch@php.net =
<mailto:willfitch@php.net>> wrote:
>=20
>=20
>=20
> While not too specific to Rowan, reiterating the pecl/http approach is =
indirectly what your asking for? I have mentioned this numerous times, =
but you haven=E2=80=99t responded with a reason not to take this =
approach - which is an RFC that was presented for discussion prior to =
yours. =20
>=20
> I'm trying to understand how pecl/http solves the aforementioned =
problem any better? Again, I have no problem with competing ideas and =
it's not as though one is prohibited from presenting an idea for the =
mere fact that there exists a competing one. I'm just not seeing how =
pecl/http solves the problem I intend to solve better. The reason I =
haven't responded to you yet is because I'm stilling weighing the two to =
try and make sense of whether or not these are in fact competing ideas =
or complimenting ones.
>=20
> Please, feel free to weigh in with anything that contradicts or =
concludes what I'm saying. I certainly don't expect to have all of the =
answers.

What doesn=E2=80=99t pecl/http solve under your situation? The fact =
that=E2=80=99s it=E2=80=99s not directly integrated as part of ZE and =
handling process?=20

I certainly have no problem with competing ideas either. However, the =
only proposed patch in this RFC is a gist with PHP pseudocode. =20

> =20
>=20


--Apple-Mail=_8B1B8EDB-E624-473B-92EE-76330B8DFFF1--