Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:78534 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 40203 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2014 20:21:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 Oct 2014 20:21:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=theanomaly.is@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=theanomaly.is@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.54 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: theanomaly.is@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.54 mail-wg0-f54.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.54] ([74.125.82.54:49666] helo=mail-wg0-f54.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 10/BB-15608-F3FE3545 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 15:21:20 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id n12so1933837wgh.27 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:21:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=JuMqxwiJuMhxkaZu9t5/vPyo2v8yIiRq8mnNdU74yXE=; b=RHRn5vID2FuZeqlRJe+yyjhP5JUI3KGqNgqrcOAqjHBKpgzNFy+i9+3l8l0ChK+k/Q KK/EXv5OnjljwXvTLQ116NpmjvHiXTmb8F2pIbFZ4slAGVk9LWRr5jAc7RuciiXHUmX9 Q8sK9cJ3lK6JCc+haq5WrSP+5n4rRnFDqrhqaFRwYSLkcsgOhwvMxGRd5RYMp/TyVirh ym9beWAxpTFcilnN1NwDcBF7E7iBcLv61QWqezijMLztpEHhYg7/elDS9Q01ob38/dD2 +MYUKACKpd6jzxFTY5KtZDZ8c+4zQE18ylNQPWRTU/i7icEaGLyrcbAk3wZcUBF6vNmQ AOBA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.74.201 with SMTP id w9mr3366918wiv.17.1414786877333; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:21:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.123.4 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:21:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5452B87B.5040009@garfieldtech.com> <0B797CE3-7AFA-4330-9A98-D3CAFC6D6072@ajf.me> <5453B114.6050400@gmail.com> <5453C250.8090803@gmail.com> <5453D6D5.2070705@garfieldtech.com> <5453E492.6020304@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 16:21:17 -0400 Message-ID: To: Will Fitch Cc: Rowan Collins , PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043c7f7241a6640506bdbdf0 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] New Standardized HTTP Interface From: theanomaly.is@gmail.com (Sherif Ramadan) --f46d043c7f7241a6640506bdbdf0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Will Fitch wrote: > > > > While not too specific to Rowan, reiterating the pecl/http approach is > indirectly what your asking for? I have mentioned this numerous times, bu= t > you haven=E2=80=99t responded with a reason not to take this approach - w= hich is an > RFC that was presented for discussion prior to yours. I'm trying to understand how pecl/http solves the aforementioned problem any better? Again, I have no problem with competing ideas and it's not as though one is prohibited from presenting an idea for the mere fact that there exists a competing one. I'm just not seeing how pecl/http solves the problem I intend to solve better. The reason I haven't responded to you yet is because I'm stilling weighing the two to try and make sense of whether or not these are in fact competing ideas or complimenting ones. Please, feel free to weigh in with anything that contradicts or concludes what I'm saying. I certainly don't expect to have all of the answers. --f46d043c7f7241a6640506bdbdf0--