Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:78391 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 48579 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2014 12:39:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Oct 2014 12:39:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ml@anderiasch.de; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ml@anderiasch.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain anderiasch.de designates 81.169.138.148 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ml@anderiasch.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 81.169.138.148 ares.art-core.org Received: from [81.169.138.148] ([81.169.138.148:42452] helo=ares.art-core.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 79/7F-56216-70D3E445 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 07:39:36 -0500 Received: from parabellum.local (p54A77149.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.167.113.73]) by ares.art-core.org (mail.art-core.org) with ESMTPSA id E27BF2EE00B; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:39:32 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <544E3CB5.50500@anderiasch.de> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:38:13 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:34.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/34.0a2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sebastian Bergmann , internals@lists.php.net References: <544E129C.8060000@php.net> <544E1E7D.6090200@php.net> In-Reply-To: <544E1E7D.6090200@php.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Currently supported versions of PHP From: ml@anderiasch.de (Florian Anderiasch) On 10/27/2014 11:29 AM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > On 10/27/2014 10:45 AM, Peter Cowburn wrote: >> The closest we have, at the moment, is probably http://php.net/eol.php >> which details the versions which are no longer supported. > > We need the inverse of that :) > >> Good question. > > Should we start http://php.net/supported-versions.php then? I'd suggest to put a table (like on wikipedia, see other child comment) on that page. Why seperate it, the correct page is already there, it just doesn't have the correct information ;) And nowadays releases are done with a set EOL date anyway. ~Florian