Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:78380
Return-Path: <mike.php.net@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 19805 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2014 08:33:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 27 Oct 2014 08:33:50 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mike.php.net@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mike.php.net@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.177 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mike.php.net@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.212.177 mail-wi0-f177.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.212.177] ([209.85.212.177:55476] helo=mail-wi0-f177.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id F2/4A-56216-D630E445 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 03:33:50 -0500
Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id ex7so5674636wid.10
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 01:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=TF0i9VZqz1Mz16KAguDzskJ37siFhfWPWBGG7ZgQoD8=;
        b=mrx2ujcVpIVBL03wZvJOQicj9evCDJyjgDxXBJwc0WDUGwiJBIa78OmG6XRSgAYHmT
         DLfWiP2bizN7DwRHFgVC1HzU+stJO3ZCce8mmNtVuSZbeKUyz8O2YOOLPPMFRg6oP2HA
         /LSZG2vjqStA3WYZ5+gfM/Tv4IJ3xH2Vqp8gG6SgJ9B+OQYcIKBSqTqD4mc6d3Swz0O5
         Kack6hs2O1MlGjVEUACjZ9+ylCcTrAiS+NNkUSwEnoCu5Fu0Ww/omOJTBncrWv0r/I+w
         V6qoCrNKmBELY6IftGBj9I9Mx2sJ8C4JfZPXGtac3+oNhWd1zI1iWVeGUVRHBORVzdat
         wcYg==
X-Received: by 10.180.95.74 with SMTP id di10mr1476673wib.54.1414398826633;
        Mon, 27 Oct 2014 01:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.163] (95-143-224-254.customer.bnet.at. [95.143.224.254])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id da3sm14770911wjb.12.2014.10.27.01.33.45
        for <multiple recipients>
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Mon, 27 Oct 2014 01:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Michael Wallner <mike.php.net@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <544E0368.5060705@php.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:33:44 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>, Patrick Schaaf <php@bof.de>, 
 Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com>
CC: internals <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <544DA1CD.9070109@php.net> <CAJ26g5SC3VtWU1GnmG7VyaGXjHOMq-N8-0ayASayPNc4EXHuxQ@mail.gmail.com> <544DEFBE.8090107@sugarcrm.com>
In-Reply-To: <544DEFBE.8090107@sugarcrm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Using objects as keys
From: mike@php.net (Michael Wallner)

On 27/10/14 08:09, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
> 
>> I don't like this, mainly because it blocks a future direct use and storage
>> of objects as keys in an array, i.e. what SplObjectStorage does.
> 
> It does not. It just allows the objects to control how they are seen
> when they are used as keys in regular PHP arrays. That does not prevent
> SplObjectStorage or anything else from doing whatever one wants. I
> personally would say SplObjectStorage probably should respect __hash if
> provided, but we can discuss it separately.

Do we want to consider to let core use spl_object_hash() if ::__hash()
is not implemented, so objects can always be used as keys?

-- 
Regards,
Mike