Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:78350 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 42804 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2014 16:58:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Oct 2014 16:58:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=bobwei9@hotmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=bobwei9@hotmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain hotmail.com designates 65.55.116.47 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: bobwei9@hotmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 65.55.116.47 blu004-omc1s36.hotmail.com Received: from [65.55.116.47] ([65.55.116.47:49451] helo=BLU004-OMC1S36.hotmail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E7/AE-36207-6282D445 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 11:58:15 -0500 Received: from BLU436-SMTP249 ([65.55.116.7]) by BLU004-OMC1S36.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Sun, 26 Oct 2014 09:58:12 -0700 X-TMN: [EIPeeSnLkNSbwWT+ynV6kldNT6I3mnIm] X-Originating-Email: [bobwei9@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\)) In-Reply-To: <544D2019.8040904@lsces.co.uk> Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:58:05 +0100 CC: internals@lists.php.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <1414217636.2624.89.camel@localhost.localdomain> <544D2019.8040904@lsces.co.uk> To: Lester Caine X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Oct 2014 16:58:09.0221 (UTC) FILETIME=[050F9F50:01CFF13E] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHPDBG nonsense (Was: Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Made phpdbg compatible with new engine: ...) From: bobwei9@hotmail.com (Bob Weinand) > Am 26.10.2014 um 17:23 schrieb Lester Caine : >=20 > On 26/10/14 15:41, Bob Weinand wrote: >> Ask them at PhpStorm. They were pleased to not have to use DBGp for = it. >> They just initially requested it because they didn=E2=80=99t knew any = better protocol. That=E2=80=99s all. >=20 > PHPStorm like PHP-FIG have their own agendas which do not play well = with > other groups of developers. Just because one thinks an idea is good = does > not mean that everybody else has to adopt it. So what becomes 'main > stream' has to have common consensus and the voting rules provide = that. >=20 > When was the vote on this rework taken? >=20 > --=20 > Lester Caine - G8HFL > ----------------------------- > Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=3Dcontact > L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk > EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ > Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk > Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk There wasn=E2=80=99t any vote and there won=E2=80=99t. /dev/null likes to listen to your complaints why we should have voted on = it. But now it=E2=80=99s in, let=E2=80=99s rather try to improve what=E2=80=99= s there than screaming for a vote - it won=E2=80=99t help anyone and = hinder possible work on improving the current thing. Next time we=E2=80=99ll put a notice a few days before, it=E2=80=99s = promised, yes. Thanks, Bob=