Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:78327 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 47760 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2014 13:14:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Oct 2014 13:14:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=bobwei9@hotmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=bobwei9@hotmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain hotmail.com designates 65.55.111.84 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: bobwei9@hotmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 65.55.111.84 blu004-omc2s9.hotmail.com Received: from [65.55.111.84] ([65.55.111.84:65217] helo=BLU004-OMC2S9.hotmail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 84/B1-36207-842AB445 for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 09:14:49 -0400 Received: from BLU436-SMTP210 ([65.55.111.72]) by BLU004-OMC2S9.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Sat, 25 Oct 2014 06:14:46 -0700 X-TMN: [ML+c/pOb+e3Y62PlNbjmr5V7X968pQCx] X-Originating-Email: [bobwei9@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\)) In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 15:14:40 +0200 CC: Derick Rethans , PHP Developers Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <1414217636.2624.89.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1414229963.2624.103.camel@localhost.localdomain> To: Leigh X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Oct 2014 13:14:43.0736 (UTC) FILETIME=[A45B3180:01CFF055] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHPDBG nonsense (Was: Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Made phpdbg compatible with new engine: ...) From: bobwei9@hotmail.com (Bob Weinand) > Am 25.10.2014 um 13:25 schrieb Leigh : >=20 > On 25 October 2014 12:00, Weinand Bob wrote: >> ... >=20 > Thanks Bob. >=20 > So my question is: Obviously the phpdbg requirements do not map to > DBGp. However, can all of the requirements of DBGp be mapped to the > phpdbg XML? >=20 > Going forward does the XML protocol cover everything XDebug needs? Can > we do "DBGp over XML=E2=80=9C? We currently also don=E2=80=99t provide e.g. exception breaks (because = either no-one of us thought of it or found it useful). There may be = already the minor problems in the other direction. But generally, one could (after adding connection overhead). Though I = wouldn=E2=80=99t think of it as a good idea as it=E2=80=99ll break = everything which doesn=E2=80=99t support phpdbg, but xdebug. But it wasn=E2=80=99t primarily intended to be forward compatible with = other debuggers. Bob=