Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:78037 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 39598 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2014 17:15:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Oct 2014 17:15:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 108.166.43.99 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 108.166.43.99 smtp99.ord1c.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [108.166.43.99] ([108.166.43.99:48062] helo=smtp99.ord1c.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 83/AB-18603-51A5D345 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 13:15:02 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp21.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9F6B03803DA; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 13:14:58 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp21.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 34FAD380428; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 13:14:58 -0400 (EDT) X-Sender-Id: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com Received: from Stass-MacBook-Pro.local (108-66-6-48.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [108.66.6.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA) by 0.0.0.0:465 (trex/5.2.13); Tue, 14 Oct 2014 17:14:58 GMT Message-ID: <543D5A11.2080601@sugarcrm.com> Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:14:57 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Xinchen Hui CC: Zeev Suraski , PHP internals References: <32b8315ede38cd03ad4a7ab4497397e9@mail.gmail.com> <543CE7CC.8010300@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: PHP 7.0 timeline From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > IMO, AST, INT64, NG, Uniforme variables style is enough for a new > marjor version.. why we still need to wait? We don't need to just "wait", as sit and do nothing. We need to allocate time for other features. > New features which missed PHP7.0, they can target at 7.1 instead. Only features that preserve BC, which is a limiting factor. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/