Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:77951 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 95825 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2014 08:08:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Oct 2014 08:08:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zeev@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zeev@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 209.85.220.178 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zeev@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.178 mail-vc0-f178.google.com Received: from [209.85.220.178] ([209.85.220.178:44643] helo=mail-vc0-f178.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 52/52-15889-4F9DC345 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 04:08:22 -0400 Received: by mail-vc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id hq12so6915255vcb.23 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 01:08:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:thread-index:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=FfTf4FqxYScKOQBDF4K1458ZrxFvP8SYSVvmhlyomqo=; b=WAj/kd7fZu3k8d4iwNsEujJUydn/DB8MxRcEx8P9qE3Pgij94IsdFbWOwbsGMW6p0Z x/Ecav55nPp/QrJzX3MfJG5kTQnyCIE+PqOdc+gV+cyLtS0Hr0kB3GPdkOL3GHd7xctW BkZGHEDgnDfqYsamGgn7bDkndcMBCvavLC5Nq65c+vDC5kZM5pmf/4mU6JqyRY0QBXJ8 kzOPwI+zAP5UVhtNoyVp5h7/NLW/AEhoY05arrJ5uVjx/Fq5NRUA8QphpFd3ptPD8W/X 0hLV6I39StuZX0/C55enSFAWo8A7Y9M9KzDX6IMlOibp9fNyLNGBoFB7ajrExnKqjgiZ JPFA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmn2w2hoi+j+ZJksPiZFO1d4jemh7pet2301Rc/aQnwVvke8KZs9KT0HYAG6JAPYC/JFI/N9U1CtyawEQhMIGJrE271cnl/e77YbsUpeMzv9fTirx+pwpY/N6Kyz5RXHVOPCK+ukDSZBI3B/I+7p4eh4cGXUA== X-Received: by 10.220.10.66 with SMTP id o2mr3240655vco.31.1413274097838; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 01:08:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac/nhgKQiZ0tGtWAQemSL03i3dcnsA== Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 11:08:17 +0300 Message-ID: <32b8315ede38cd03ad4a7ab4497397e9@mail.gmail.com> To: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3eb0892840d05055d84eb Subject: RFC: PHP 7.0 timeline From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski) --001a11c3eb0892840d05055d84eb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All, We=E2=80=99ve had some discussions about it during the version name & phpng= RFC processes, and now that 5.6.0 is behind us =E2=80=93 I think it=E2=80=99s t= ime to get a more concrete game plan for PHP 7.0. I drafted an RFC that proposes a one year timeline for PHP 7.0. I believe it strikes a good balance between early delivery to stay competitive, and having enough time to shape a major version. Given that we=E2=80=99ve alre= ady made some very substantial progress towards 7.0 (with phpng, AST, uniform variable syntax, etc.) =E2=80=93 I think that timeline is very realistic, a= nd perhaps we can even beat it. Restating the obvious, new features that don=E2=80=99t have compatibility implications can always be delivered in mi= nor versions, i.e. 7.1, 7.2, etc. The RFC is at https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php7timeline - comments welcome! Zeev --001a11c3eb0892840d05055d84eb--