Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:77813 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 440 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2014 17:41:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Oct 2014 17:41:12 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=markus@fischer.name; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=markus@fischer.name; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain fischer.name from 62.179.121.48 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: markus@fischer.name X-Host-Fingerprint: 62.179.121.48 fep28.mx.upcmail.net Solaris 10 (beta) Received: from [62.179.121.48] ([62.179.121.48:35769] helo=fep28.mx.upcmail.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 9A/7E-30869-4B524345 for ; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 13:41:09 -0400 Received: from edge02.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.237]) by viefep28-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.05.05 201-2260-151-110-20120111) with ESMTP id <20141007174103.YPSU560.viefep28-int.chello.at@edge02.upcmail.net> for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 19:41:03 +0200 Received: from mail02.home ([213.47.1.174]) by edge02.upcmail.net with edge id 0Hh11p00v3lFLNl01Hh1Ge; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 19:41:02 +0200 X-SourceIP: 213.47.1.174 Received: from rage.home ([192.168.1.52]) by mail02.home with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XbYkv-0001LU-LW for internals@lists.php.net; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 19:41:02 +0200 Message-ID: <543425A4.7020401@fischer.name> Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 19:40:52 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <4ED7146272E04A47B986ED49E771E347BD7DB8503E@Ikarus.ameusgmbh.intern> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "scanner01.home", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 07.10.2014 14:15, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > yes, this was also suggested before, but that will be also a BC break for > those people already using the name of the new parent class ( > https://github.com/search?l=php&q=EngineException&type=Code&utf8=%E2%9C%93 > for example). > which can be still an ok decision, I'm just stating/repeating the pro/cons > as this was all discussed before. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Exceptions in the engine From: markus@fischer.name (Markus Fischer) On 07.10.2014 14:15, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > yes, this was also suggested before, but that will be also a BC break for > those people already using the name of the new parent class ( > https://github.com/search?l=php&q=EngineException&type=Code&utf8=%E2%9C%93 > for example). > which can be still an ok decision, I'm just stating/repeating the pro/cons > as this was all discussed before. It should be considered that most of the results of this links are using namespaces, the minority doesn't. And those ask for trouble anyway, IMHO, if they don't use any kind of namespacing (be it old PEAR conventions or using real namespaces). - Markus