Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:77770 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 52821 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2014 21:14:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Oct 2014 21:14:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 108.166.43.67 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 108.166.43.67 smtp67.ord1c.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [108.166.43.67] ([108.166.43.67:44684] helo=smtp67.ord1c.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 39/03-39134-AA11F245 for ; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 17:14:19 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp9.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 7371A38037F; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 17:14:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp9.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 2A638380216; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 17:14:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Sender-Id: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com Received: from Stass-MacBook-Pro.local ([UNAVAILABLE]. [74.85.23.222]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA) by 0.0.0.0:465 (trex/5.2.13); Fri, 03 Oct 2014 21:14:16 GMT Message-ID: <542F11A7.70401@sugarcrm.com> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 14:14:15 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrea Faulds CC: "internals@lists.php.net" References: <42.58.10205.32DCE245@pb1.pair.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PHP7] Remove the function keyword from class methods? From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > Easy to implement, too. What are the list’s thoughts? I don’t think it really hampers readability much. It's pretty faint praise - "doesn't hamper much". I think language feature should do better than not hurting too much. We don't need to change things and fragment the language just because we can do it without hurting too much. Instead, we should think about what it would improve - and frankly I don't see too much improvement coming out of it. We've discussed this a number of times, it's not broken, it doesn't need fixing. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/