Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:77769
Return-Path: <leight@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 51143 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2014 21:12:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 3 Oct 2014 21:12:28 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=leight@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=leight@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.49 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: leight@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.49 mail-wg0-f49.google.com  
Received: from [74.125.82.49] ([74.125.82.49:47559] helo=mail-wg0-f49.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id DF/92-39134-B311F245 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 17:12:28 -0400
Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id x12so2511875wgg.32
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 14:12:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=sPMgPMWIWzPoNC2A1h7qw878ilcAICSnIGOhBQ/L3JM=;
        b=e7L+NoxApGEB2foqQuaMH74rXaFcJKnRnUw28lQ61zqU/7NxC8M5Os4kAb+ZkRrkaQ
         DtzgY5zRv22RuvA9jFAxCwpKic94k5AjFPG84dXC7SP5Pe1L0gVG0QLfBUv5XGztR+uG
         t14l2wfdVbChAGzu9qSs5tcLQZH940LZlWNddh0GHuPSYZt7fo35FBNhZ/3bCSbsrdQl
         dU4ORmRolHtm+ZcDHc739+Tktq5BOmYEQtpmUSd6x8hDyUFtOOg7XQOHCJCsxccfzcFH
         kBHQu+XYFx5gCObg8TvtMzcsB0AdZXioYdECUCFN27XTCRAtc1jbldYo8JjvwzR1fipk
         EEYA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.249.199 with SMTP id yw7mr6771750wjc.135.1412370745227;
 Fri, 03 Oct 2014 14:12:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.217.55.195 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 14:12:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D477B6A9-6548-45A5-9DDC-ED2A99DB600E@ajf.me>
References: <CAPwsocHm4wme7TDX-1hp=PdNGi0KzAwRz4RezW3KddV9_4m=JQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPwsocHtAjmEJdTRwfNjeqZ=cPm_gL2P=5vvawuDNmC3jRt-5Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<D477B6A9-6548-45A5-9DDC-ED2A99DB600E@ajf.me>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 22:12:25 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPwsocGnNuQC_jC10FscfA0SSGR_pjDRKLSDe+=W+qy1AAwdww@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] Loop... or...
From: leight@gmail.com (Leigh)

On 3 October 2014 20:04, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote:
>
> Huh, why is the keyword choice not part of the vote? So, if people vote f=
or it with =E2=80=98or=E2=80=99, you could change it to something completel=
y different?
>
> I don=E2=80=99t think that=E2=80=99s normal procedure.

Because there currently isn't a choice.