Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:77714
Return-Path: <leight@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 48438 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2014 06:58:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 30 Sep 2014 06:58:07 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=leight@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=leight@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.181 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: leight@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.181 mail-we0-f181.google.com  
Received: from [74.125.82.181] ([74.125.82.181:52440] helo=mail-we0-f181.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 71/00-48312-D745A245 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 02:58:06 -0400
Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id u57so2831359wes.26
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 23:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=LMnJCo4/1f820J27cLKDpuGijDUJKusPA8E8mv+adX8=;
        b=awfVllwLCEHRfy59NB5QVWKT5dWOlJlsdfyK5T8hzUvRJS5waW38S3gdevNF54YJAk
         s+Cc2RiSuSzyo7iWcy6tz/d+sj+lllIS7uGqafNM3l8WK9y6lR1C59ZjXmJZJp5/mgNh
         4sl0YyZHr6WxVPD7q7si56jkjYukB+Abz+mM1uyyuFbKFaESg1O0oeaMFosj0diULVcN
         A4KXzozXVSqErbS3xZ3OKdP/xzQTeA8HUke9BmCZIRKSL/v9yW0gMWd5PvHyaU+ghTQd
         KX8q/A4dYlh0u8xffr9c9l1M4Zs1s81xdYwW2bceixm4zJg7wZnz1LmgMGahi6uLjnDN
         LBkA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.242.33 with SMTP id wn1mr9820386wjc.110.1412060282445;
 Mon, 29 Sep 2014 23:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.217.55.195 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 23:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFp73Xv_bhs5zhA-7Fr4wchiEMCA76a9qMiSQA77CVf9-PnseA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFp73Xv_bhs5zhA-7Fr4wchiEMCA76a9qMiSQA77CVf9-PnseA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:58:02 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPwsocFOP9NYQVxXd1jne-1r6tBKMS-wJ1kYnwN1qnVd1uLC9g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "guilhermeblanco@gmail.com" <guilhermeblanco@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Move pecl_sync to core
From: leight@gmail.com (Leigh)

On 30 September 2014 04:06, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com
<guilhermeblanco@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a new RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/sync
>
> Thoughts appreciated.
>

What are the actual benefits of this being included in core? The RFC
doesn't really list any.

Also, there was a discussion in June (started by Julien) about
refactoring PHPs IO layer, where many people expressed a wish to have
something libuv based in core, this comes with cross-platform
semaphors and mutexes as well as a TON of other awesome goodies. If
anything, this is what I would prefer in core.