Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:77675 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 98556 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2014 13:27:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Sep 2014 13:27:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ajf@ajf.me; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ajf@ajf.me; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ajf.me designates 192.64.116.216 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ajf@ajf.me X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.64.116.216 imap10-3.ox.privateemail.com Received: from [192.64.116.216] ([192.64.116.216:50498] helo=imap10-3.ox.privateemail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 01/11-27807-EB965245 for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 09:27:27 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C710C2400E4; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 09:27:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap10.ox.privateemail.com Received: from mail.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap10.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id HrF2_x4JqdS9; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 09:27:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from oa-res-27-90.wireless.abdn.ac.uk (oa-res-27-90.wireless.abdn.ac.uk [137.50.27.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0355D2400D6; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 09:27:20 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 14:27:17 +0100 Cc: Dmitry Stogov , Nikita Popov , Leigh , PHP Internals Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: To: Pierre Joye X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Fix list() behavior inconsistency From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrea Faulds) On 26 Sep 2014, at 14:25, Pierre Joye wrote: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Dmitry Stogov = wrote: >> When I started this RFC I didn't thought about objects. >> Actually, they are handled with the same inconsistency problem. >>=20 >> Nikita, feel free to add this note to RFC. >> May be it'll change mind of some voters :) >>=20 >> also add a link to your patch. >=20 > Please do not :) Enough mess with RFC changed while being voting on. Yeah, that=92s a pretty big change. I wouldn=92t vote how I did if it = meant affecting ArrayAccess. Please restart the vote. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/