Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:77554 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 52373 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2014 19:09:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Sep 2014 19:09:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.54 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.192.54 mail-qg0-f54.google.com Received: from [209.85.192.54] ([209.85.192.54:42306] helo=mail-qg0-f54.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D9/26-20247-E65C1245 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:09:34 -0400 Received: by mail-qg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id a108so4878458qge.41 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 12:09:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=iRarER8jihsXdKsfmhtZ5kp9vr+1i10PDLniiGggbHc=; b=IB6HEphvHbzLogC/ZgkqgAgXv9mE0p87b/XrWGhrSkKqVyGx3rIYOPvhvq2Rq2Wrsv buqOvLf2R2CLJwpI/nqqMEvpbK1IiKNa0b+Mf2izbn3hSUxEJ909kgzSUTz3ASFtmrkd kTQRsWQdIH4V56+tGDgCNdCEQk3dviWFtIgQk2uCkfdlRaIA7Sa40AU29YPzcnP0W/P/ AwXxpZziXizVerzwmNljDNj/03mtJbasHQAh2zxcyxsIsVtYYtkghzrdJ3yxMyC+i5BE T5HQhtc++QNMskJSJ3NfSPwEc8O1anBQWtHS29DqUfr+XqgHY7MJJw4OImPPjAZMq3o3 50tg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.129.1 with SMTP id m1mr2727660qas.0.1411499371393; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 12:09:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.22.51 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 12:09:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.22.51 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 12:09:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <15ca68c8c509c971d654a5d2bab51ba1@mail.gmail.com> References: <8DEFB90E-0F7F-4876-890D-D4AD1C655D87@ajf.me> <54212EE9.6070108@anderiasch.de> <006f01cfd73d$59571590$0c0540b0$@tutteli.ch> <15ca68c8c509c971d654a5d2bab51ba1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 21:09:31 +0200 Message-ID: To: Zeev Suraski Cc: Derick Rethans , Ferenc Kovacs , PHP internals , Andrea Faulds , Andrey Andreev , Robert Stoll , Florian Anderiasch Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c23276a1f8fa0503c04e8c Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Is it fair that people with no karma can vote on RFCs? From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) --001a11c23276a1f8fa0503c04e8c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sep 23, 2014 8:17 PM, "Zeev Suraski" wrote: > > I'd welcome better suggestions if anybody has any. I think the complete > lack of metrics and exceptionally low barrier to voting is a much bigger > problem. > Please point me at a vote where the author is not part of what you defined (and the rfc): - php karma (doc) - lead of leading projects Now to create classes along developers or regular contributors is the worst idea we can have. It says that writing docs is less valuable than a PoC. Wrong in so many ways. > Perhaps LoC? Oh gosh... > > That said, 20 commits is an exceptionally low bar IMHO to get a say for a > project with a *HUGE* impact such as PHP. And what's about zero commit in 5+ years? This discussion has the bad taste of creating a kind of elite in php.net. --001a11c23276a1f8fa0503c04e8c--