Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:77541 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 26802 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2014 15:46:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Sep 2014 15:46:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tyra3l@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tyra3l@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.216.48 mail-qa0-f48.google.com Received: from [209.85.216.48] ([209.85.216.48:55197] helo=mail-qa0-f48.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id DC/31-20247-7D591245 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:46:31 -0400 Received: by mail-qa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id k15so1732234qaq.7 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:46:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=owAYo4iEE8HDxU+E2+cFbl3NnqNHkxwaHAHcntcduQI=; b=GLuEvCR8ZE/bamk0T7bTb0W4SYW411U3nbgKRvFD9wWajypS8ujSvlgS6ezLzUPf4B Zkqrj1D12K8RFnNkHZv4fgNlh/qcnCl4+a8UmY1E634p1LyIOlgw/BOQv7gLgnhTxdve AgPELrTjNasbzde6NnwU7T6Hn0ySI3Ij6FcqboWr7fDBlC0Bm5MNKBsBa6DONy8fr9fz epDD6V/kn3R7OV3+XXzXIhq4sNsgts0LPjHFYSBNWUu/8X8wFLbdotm8Xh5UhWvw/oSm s5ueQNZ9+LNY3ualNhKurJqEsaxbJjN9QE6ucMU4p6LoOPBGumLYGEOKtvwE9QpApT6K CmXw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.229.48.135 with SMTP id r7mr699040qcf.9.1411487188223; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:46:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.91.14 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:46:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <007c01cfd743$f9dacb00$ed906100$@tutteli.ch> References: <8DEFB90E-0F7F-4876-890D-D4AD1C655D87@ajf.me> <54212EE9.6070108@anderiasch.de> <006f01cfd73d$59571590$0c0540b0$@tutteli.ch> <007c01cfd743$f9dacb00$ed906100$@tutteli.ch> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 17:46:28 +0200 Message-ID: To: Robert Stoll Cc: Andrey Andreev , Florian Anderiasch , Zeev Suraski , Derick Rethans , Andrea Faulds , PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133b512758f480503bd78b1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Is it fair that people with no karma can vote on RFCs? From: tyra3l@gmail.com (Ferenc Kovacs) --001a1133b512758f480503bd78b1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Robert Stoll wrote: > > > > > > I do not think it makes sense to take the number of commits as metric= . > > > People's commit behaviour is different. Some commit only once after > > > everything is done and others commit regularly after each achieved > > > small step towards the goal. > > > I belong rather to the second group. Why should I be favoured over > > > another person who has only one commit in his pull request? > > > > > > > > are you favored? > > I was just pointing out a factual error about a claim in an earlier > message and how other factors can influence the number of > > commits counted attributed to a person. > > > > Sorry, you obviously interpreted my message in a way I did not intend to > bring it over. I did not intend to attack you or something. I merely want= ed > to point out that there are additional aspects which makes number of > commits a rather fuzzy metric. > If this metric were be used then people which commit more regularly would > be favoured and with committing regularly I do not mean implement many > features, fixing bugs etc. but just that they use the git command "commit= " > more often than others. > > and I completely agree with that. replying to my email (which only corrected some numbers) seemed like you are assuming/projecting that it was my idea to bring those numbers to the discussion. --=20 Ferenc Kov=C3=A1cs @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu --001a1133b512758f480503bd78b1--