Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:77540 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 24947 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2014 15:35:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Sep 2014 15:35:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@tutteli.ch; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@tutteli.ch; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain tutteli.ch designates 80.74.154.78 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@tutteli.ch X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.74.154.78 ns73.kreativmedia.ch Linux 2.6 Received: from [80.74.154.78] ([80.74.154.78:46509] helo=hyperion.kreativmedia.ch) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 1B/D0-20247-83391245 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:35:21 -0400 Received: (qmail 7088 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2014 17:35:16 +0200 Received: from cm56-129-238.liwest.at (HELO RoLaptop) (86.56.129.238) by ns73.kreativmedia.ch with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 23 Sep 2014 17:35:16 +0200 To: "'Ferenc Kovacs'" Cc: "'Andrey Andreev'" , "'Florian Anderiasch'" , "'Zeev Suraski'" , "'Derick Rethans'" , "'Andrea Faulds'" , "'PHP internals'" References: <8DEFB90E-0F7F-4876-890D-D4AD1C655D87@ajf.me> <54212EE9.6070108@anderiasch.de> <006f01cfd73d$59571590$0c0540b0$@tutteli.ch> In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 17:35:15 +0200 Message-ID: <007c01cfd743$f9dacb00$ed906100$@tutteli.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQJOsOQfXJ1mcwUfmkfl+q+sqH0cqwIoPOz2Ag/39pQB85L8yQHybrxaAVlwYCQCeLLuHQESnhrBAZB8WaKanIiqUA== Content-Language: de-ch Subject: AW: [PHP-DEV] Is it fair that people with no karma can vote on RFCs? From: php@tutteli.ch ("Robert Stoll") > > > > I do not think it makes sense to take the number of commits as = metric. > > People's commit behaviour is different. Some commit only once after > > everything is done and others commit regularly after each achieved > > small step towards the goal. > > I belong rather to the second group. Why should I be favoured over > > another person who has only one commit in his pull request? > > > > > are you favored? > I was just pointing out a factual error about a claim in an earlier = message and how other factors can influence the number of > commits counted attributed to a person. >=20 Sorry, you obviously interpreted my message in a way I did not intend to = bring it over. I did not intend to attack you or something. I merely = wanted to point out that there are additional aspects which makes number = of commits a rather fuzzy metric.=20 If this metric were be used then people which commit more regularly = would be favoured and with committing regularly I do not mean implement = many features, fixing bugs etc. but just that they use the git command = "commit" more often than others.