Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:77537 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 18664 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2014 14:47:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Sep 2014 14:47:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@tutteli.ch; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@tutteli.ch; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain tutteli.ch designates 80.74.154.78 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@tutteli.ch X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.74.154.78 ns73.kreativmedia.ch Linux 2.6 Received: from [80.74.154.78] ([80.74.154.78:34708] helo=hyperion.kreativmedia.ch) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 2C/33-01186-91881245 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 10:47:54 -0400 Received: (qmail 29444 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2014 16:47:50 +0200 Received: from cm56-129-238.liwest.at (HELO RoLaptop) (86.56.129.238) by ns73.kreativmedia.ch with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 23 Sep 2014 16:47:49 +0200 To: "'Ferenc Kovacs'" , "'Andrey Andreev'" Cc: "'Florian Anderiasch'" , "'Zeev Suraski'" , "'Derick Rethans'" , "'Andrea Faulds'" , "'PHP internals'" References: <8DEFB90E-0F7F-4876-890D-D4AD1C655D87@ajf.me> <54212EE9.6070108@anderiasch.de> In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:47:49 +0200 Message-ID: <006f01cfd73d$59571590$0c0540b0$@tutteli.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQJOsOQfXJ1mcwUfmkfl+q+sqH0cqwIoPOz2Ag/39pQB85L8yQHybrxaAVlwYCQCeLLuHZqxlT6w Content-Language: de-ch Subject: AW: [PHP-DEV] Is it fair that people with no karma can vote on RFCs? From: php@tutteli.ch ("Robert Stoll") > one of your pr's did not keep the author info, it seems as it was = squashed into a single commit: > = http://git.php.net/?p=3Dphp-src.git;a=3Dcommit;h=3Dec2fff80e768dfb04aa393= c06a2b1a42a9e871ff > so it isn't a problem with the list, but how your PR was merged. > ofc. probably there are other similar cases, so the potential number = of people with more than 20 commits could be > different, but this the info we have easy access to, and I don't think = that it would change the numbers significantly. >=20 > -- > Ferenc Kov=C3=A1cs > @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu I do not think it makes sense to take the number of commits as metric. = People's commit behaviour is different. Some commit only once after = everything is done and others commit regularly after each achieved small = step towards the goal. I belong rather to the second group. Why should I be favoured over = another person who has only one commit in his pull request?