Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:77480
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.47 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a765f4d0ebe9cd29d22ff9d8dd337d94@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8DEFB90E-0F7F-4876-890D-D4AD1C655D87@ajf.me>
	<alpine.DEB.2.11.1409221231540.4267@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl>
	<a765f4d0ebe9cd29d22ff9d8dd337d94@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:03:49 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU4938omzvGpbdOi2bLH1RvF7E0gv9awqPcP47Q73iN-2g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>
Cc: Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c303086882660503ac1cd2
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Is it fair that people with no karma can vote on RFCs?
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

--001a11c303086882660503ac1cd2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Sep 22, 2014 8:56 PM, "Zeev Suraski" <zeev@zend.com> wrote:

> Last, the 2nd sub-bullet of the 2nd bullet ("regular participant of
> internals discussions") is especially problematic - as it basically pulls
> the barrier to entry to nothing, and is the opposite of well-defined.
When
> we revise the Voting RFC, it should go IMHO.  Talk is cheap - the way to
get
> a vote with PHP is to contribute - be it with code, docs, testing,
> frameworks or apps.

To kill the FUD about totally random ppl being able to vote:

To my knowdlege, nobody fitting in what is describe in this last line ever
voted. If someone knows a case where it happened, let me know.

--001a11c303086882660503ac1cd2--