Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:77468 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 59207 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2014 14:21:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Sep 2014 14:21:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=kassner@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=kassner@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: kassner@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.176 mail-we0-f176.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.176] ([74.125.82.176:53036] helo=mail-we0-f176.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 1A/45-31799-08030245 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 10:21:53 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f176.google.com with SMTP id w61so2140778wes.35 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 07:21:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=ROOh50JAeSYCkM9EVYl9x34e43TBzrgxFbV3UZD2ql8=; b=FTFJrjx5uV6aiOT+wHOKVZkkAwzxCpRTXzGegtnx+CilePblFx5NTW5yMcPz7x+hKg exP9cOx/9I4PB7QdPYpFSv+82XNYsyvoRmszTl5L2/Tbd0HXmjhmZ51MOzNm6TY6OB2m vwfRBK6MTzQCGYxDdtI7QodpJpjVdvpmnKHwEcdySve3XeRmfOaO0TRkLBUg79IUkHG+ gdFeNuQ350gWm5dWJVZuuq4IoRxMZ1Ix5qss2SBP/9J5obmLnRYuZi1bOsknUUBLKwnw H1w81ru6JmM9vA+H89OGOcKIqxPpOM30QVzcB/s6Ip5yinTdBnovoga4rHaDJv+c4DX2 ciJQ== X-Received: by 10.194.237.2 with SMTP id uy2mr3614769wjc.89.1411395710012; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 07:21:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kassner@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.24.70 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 07:21:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8DEFB90E-0F7F-4876-890D-D4AD1C655D87@ajf.me> Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:21:29 -0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ISCgFCQmCDWaQV5Pd-qWsL5TueE Message-ID: To: Pierre Joye Cc: Derick Rethans , PHP internals , Andrea Faulds , Andrey Andreev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01493f68ef03100503a82bce Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Is it fair that people with no karma can vote on RFCs? From: kassner@php.net (Rafael Kassner) --089e01493f68ef03100503a82bce Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable IMHO, denying non-karma people to vote is like to making PHP a company's product, or, in another words, "you use what we built and shut up", because only listening people won't allow to accept/deny a particular RFC, only votes do. People surely don't comment (myself included) why they are choosing some particular option on a RFC, but they are making their opinion count, and I think this kind of "democracy power" shouldn't be voided. Using separated voting count isn't an option? Like only internal changes are voted only by people with karma and features/changes/small BC breaks that affects userland are allowed to anyone. This way I believe is easy to say if either internals and community agrees with the proposed change and community people are making their opinion count. On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: > On Sep 22, 2014 3:29 PM, "Derick Rethans" wrote: > > > > On Mon, 22 Sep 2014, Andrey Andreev wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote: > > > > > > > > On 22 Sep 2014, at 12:32, Derick Rethans wrote: > > > > > > > >> On Sat, 20 Sep 2014, Andrea Faulds wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Perhaps I=E2=80=99m being unfair and overthinking things, but I w= onder if > > > >>> it is really fair for people who have no karma, i.e. not > > > >>> contributors to the documentation, extensions, php-src or anythin= g > > > >>> else, to have the ability to vote on RFCs? > > > >>> > > > >>> I=E2=80=99d never suggest people without internals karma can=E2= =80=99t vote. I > > > >>> think doc and peck contributors are as valued as any other > > > >>> contributors. However, people with no karma whatsoever (a blank > > > >>> people.php.net page) voting irks me. > > > >> > > > >> I think people's votes should only count if they have karma to the > > > >> section of the code that the RFC/feature/whatever relates to. > > > > > > > > Is that really fair? If we break BC, plenty of userland developers > > > > might be affected and they should have a right to chime in. > > > > > > That would be quite unfair, not just because of BC breaks and/or > > > userland developers' votes (there aren't many, afaik). > > > Practically every language change would be decided by only a handful > > > of people, while it should be important that many votes are gathered > > > for important decisions. > > > > There is a big difference between votes, and voices. Voices should > > definitely be listened too. > > We agree on listening. Only not on how we listen. > > > Derick > > > > -- > > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > --089e01493f68ef03100503a82bce--